My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-054 - Overruling The Orange County Airport Land Use Commission’s Determination that the Proposed Related Bristol Specific Plan is Inconsistent
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2024
>
2024-054 - Overruling The Orange County Airport Land Use Commission’s Determination that the Proposed Related Bristol Specific Plan is Inconsistent
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 10:43:09 AM
Creation date
10/9/2024 10:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Planning & Building
Doc #
2024-054
Item #
26
Date
10/1/2024
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the site. The new residential and commercial uses on the <br />site would use similar technology that does not cause <br />electronic interference that could affect aircraft. Thus, <br />impacts related to electronic interference with operations of <br />JWA would not occur. <br />c. Compatible Land Use. It will take appropriate action, to the <br />extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to <br />restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity <br />of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal <br />airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In <br />addition, if the Project is for noise compatibility program <br />implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land <br />use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with <br />respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility program <br />measures upon which Federal funds have been expended. <br />4. Overflight. "Close to the JWA approach centerline" as identified by the <br />ALUC is neither an FAA nor an AELUP standard. <br />a. The FAA is the only authoritative source of aviation safety data <br />and the FAA does not have a `close to the JWA approach <br />centerline" standard. <br />b. The AELUP clearly identifies its airport land use planning <br />standards around aircraft noise, safety, and height. Objective <br />measures of these standards are clearly identified in AELUP <br />Section 2.1. The Specific Plan is drafted to be consistent with <br />each of these objective standards. <br />c. Two-dimensional flight tracks and a list of unassociated aircraft <br />do nothing to inform the impact of overflights. The ALUC <br />provided limited arrival flight tracks, limited departure flight <br />tracks and lists of aircraft by time of day and altitude that were <br />purported to have produced these flight tracks. The limited <br />nature of the information was commented on by ALUC <br />commissioners during the July 20, 2023 hearing. <br />d. Aircraft noise contours used to objectively measure noise <br />impact already assume flight tracks and actual operating <br />conditions for a full year including future operations. Limited <br />Resolution No. 2024-054 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.