My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2024-10-15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
10/15/2024
>
Agenda Packet_2024-10-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 1:57:56 PM
Creation date
10/9/2024 1:47:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
10/15/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Incomplete proposals will be deemed <br />as nonresponsive and will be rejected. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals <br />submitted and no representation is made hereby that any commitment will be awarded pursuant <br />to this RFP or otherwise. <br />PLEASE NOTE: <br />· All forms above must be signed by a representative of the Firm that is legally <br />authorized to contractually bind the Proposer. <br />· City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the required <br />attachments. <br />VII. REFERENCES <br />Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services <br />similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B – References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br /> <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if: <br />· References fail to substantiate Proposer’s description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br /> <br />· References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br /> <br />· City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer’s responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br />VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See EXHIBIT II – Sample Agreement <br />IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 15 – 11 10/15/2024
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.