Laserfiche WebLink
modeling appendices for consistency with the technical study conclusions (if provided). However, this <br />scope does not include detailed review or investigations into the modeling software or outputs (should <br />this level of effort be desired, we would welcome a discussion on the fee and schedule implications and <br />any augments that may be necessary). Where discrepancies in the analysis are found, we will raise those <br />deficiencies early in the process and offer solutions for the applicant and its team to resolve the issues. <br />We will document comments and critiques through comment features in MS Word or Adobe Acrobat. <br />Any required revisions will be completed by the applicant and resubmitted. Ascent will participate in one <br />meeting with the City (and if desired, the applicant's team) to discuss review comments. <br />Deliverables <br />e Initial peer review comments, critiques, advice on solutions for the exemption documentation and <br />the technical studies to be provided electronically in MS Word or Adobe PDF <br />• Attendance at one meeting (assumed to be virtual) by up to three Ascent staff <br />Task 3: Backcheck Peer Review of CEQA Exemption and Technical Analyses <br />Following any revisions that may be necessary, we will conduct a second review to determine if comments <br />have been adequately addressed by the applicant's team. We assume that all documentation and data <br />will be adequate and internally consistent after the revised submittals. <br />Deliverables <br />Backcheck review comments, critiques, advice on solutions for the Initial Study, Draft EIR, and <br />technical studies to be provided electronically in MS Word or Adobe PDF- <br />Task 4: Project Management and Meetings <br />The Ascent project management team will devote effort each week to ensure an efficient and timely <br />process for project execution. We will develop a mutually agreeable schedule prior to the kickoff meeting <br />and will maintain and update the schedule throughout the environmental review process. Our project <br />manager will track the critical path and inform the City of critical milestones that may be at risk. Other <br />typical tasks would include cost tracking, budget management, participation in conference/video-call <br />meetings, and unscheduled phone calls and email communication, as needed. <br />We understand the City may desire to establish regular meetings. We have budgeted for participation in <br />up to two additional conference -call meetings (two team members at 1 hour each), separate from the <br />meeting in Task 2. <br />Ascent can also be available to support the City during public meetings. We have not included this in our <br />budget but will gladly add this at the City's request for an additional fee. <br />Deliverables <br />• Participation in up to two virtual meetings <br />e Schedule updates, as needed <br />• Monthly progress reports <br />ESTIMATED TIMELINE <br />Ascent proposes to complete the initial peer review of the CEQA Class 32. Exemption documentation and <br />technical studies within 2 weeks from receipt of complete documents. In addition, we propose to <br />complete the backcheck second peer review within 1 week of receiving the revised documents. We <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA # CEQA CLASS 32 EXEMPTION PEER REVIEW FOR THE EXTRA SPACE STORAGE AT FOURTH STREET <br />