My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - PH #35
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Correspondence - PH #35
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 7:22:08 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 2:37:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana City Council <br />November 18, 2024 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />right to exclude. <br /> <br />Importantly, the Federal District Court of Hawaii recently considered an ordinance similar to that <br />proposed by Santa Ana that barred certain STRs. (-Term Rental All. v. City & <br />Cnty. of Honolulu, 2022 WL 7471692, at *2-3 (D. Haw. Oct. 13, 2022).) <br />motion for a preliminary injunction, the court held that the plaintiff would likely succeed on the <br />merits of a takings claim under the Federal and Hawaii Constitutions. (Id. at *5.) <br /> <br />Because the Ordinance impacts both the right to include and the right to exclude from <br />property, all existing STR hosts would be entitled to compensation if the City Council were to <br />adopt the Amended Ordinance. <br /> <br />4. The adoption of the Amended Ordinance would constitute arbitrary and capricious <br />decision-making. <br /> <br />There is no evidence in the record <br />record. STRs play an important and environmentally sustainable role in the City, and provide <br />significant benefits to the City, its residents, and its visitors, and these benefits are being <br />completely ignored. The Staff Report provides no evidence that any STRs in the City contribute <br />to nuisance- <br />acknowledge that the SAMC already has several existing enforcement mechanisms to mitigate <br />public nuisances. (SAMC, Chapter 17.) <br /> <br />In reality, many STRs in the City are either owner-occupied, meaning that the host is on site while <br />guests are present because they live there full-time and have an extra room/rooms, or are entire <br />home STRs which are rented on a short-term basis because the owner travels or is in the City only <br />on a seasonal basis and so cannot rent the property on a long-term basis (e.g., six-month or one- <br />year lease). Further, as discussed in a recent study conducted by the Milken Institute on STRs in <br /> 1 <br /> <br /> <br />A review of the Housing Element reveals that the City does not appear to mention STRs anywhere <br />in that document. (See City of Santa Ana General Plan Housing Element). In the section of the <br />at various factors influencing <br />rehabilitation costs, availability of financing, and recent trends in foreclosures), governmental <br />factors (land use regulations, development standards, building codes, permit procedures, and other <br />local policies), and environmental factors (adequacy of infrastructure, public services, and water <br /> <br />1 <br /> Alissa Dubetz, Matt Horton, and Charlotte Kesteven, Staying Power: The Effects of Short-Term Rentals on <br />, M ILKEN I NSTITUTE (May 2022), <br />https://milkeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/Short_Term_Rentals_California.pdf. <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.