My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - PH #35
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Correspondence - PH #35
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 7:22:08 PM
Creation date
11/13/2024 2:37:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana City Council <br />November 18, 2024 <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />The City Has Refused To Provide Evidence Surrounding its Treatment of STRs and the <br />Basis for Banning STRs in Violation of the California Public Records Act <br /> <br />In April 2024, a Public Records Act request was filed with the City in an effort to understand what <br />motivated the City a total ban on STRs. Over six months later, the City has still not <br />produced a response to the PRA. (See PRA 24-715.) The City has responded to over 1,000 PRA <br />requestAs such, the <br />City appears to be concealing the true motivations for seeking to ban all STRs in the City. To date, <br />the City has not provided any evidence to support its claim that STRs in the City have a negative <br />impact on public health, safety, and welfare, if any even exists. <br /> <br />We strongly urge the Council to refrain from taking any action on the proposed STR prohibition <br />until the City has responded to the Public Records Act request. <br /> <br />Proposed Path Forward <br /> <br />We urge the City Council to rescind the currently effective and illegally adopted Ordinance, reject <br />the Amended Ordinance, and direct Staff to work with all stakeholders to develop a new ordinance <br />that authorizes STRs to continue operating subject to reasonable regulations. Specifically, we <br />recommend establishing an <br />This type of regulation strikes the appropriate balance while maintaining the ability of STR owners <br />to operate in the City. <br /> <br />While the Rental Alliance is ready and willing to work with the City, for the reasons summarized <br />above, should the City Council move forward with adopting the Amended Ordinance we will <br />challenge this action in court to protect rights. <br /> <br /> Sincerely, <br /> <br /> GAINES & STACEY LLP <br /> <br /> Alicia B. Bartley <br /> By <br /> ALICIA B. BARTLEY <br /> <br /> <br />cc: Jose Montoya (Via Email - jmontoya@santa-ana.org) <br /> Amy Hoyt (Via Email - Amy.Hoyt@bbklaw.com) <br /> Hannah Park (Via Email - Hannah.Park@bbklaw.com) <br /> <br />Attachments <br />Attachment A CAJA Environmental Services, Potential Significant Environmental <br />Effects of Banning Short-Term Rentals in the City of Santa and Requirement Require <br />Additional Environmental Analysis Under CEQA, November 14, 2024. <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.