My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2024 10:01:45 AM
Creation date
11/15/2024 8:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
34
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. The use of termite tenting to conceal the unauthorized removal and replacement of the <br />iron casement windows original to the property, <br />c. Publicly voicing at large gatherings that their intent is that the property be designated a <br />Vietnamese Cultural Site/Museum in the future, <br />Property uge end traffic: As indication of the owner's furtherance of the objective towards the <br />recharacterization of this property as a cultural center -- hence the continued addition of <br />accessory structures to their property— they hold frequent/seasonal cultural gatherings/festivals <br />and tours, often times with film and sound crews. On more than one occasion, multiple school <br />buses from as far away as Huntington Beach have parked in front of the property as groups <br />disembark for tours (see attached photos taken on March 14, 2024). As well, the several annual <br />events/festivals (such as the Moon Festival on September 10, 2022) have brought a high volume <br />of cars that line Heliotrope and Santa Clara, often times with no consideration for driveways of <br />other homeowners. <br />City of Ggntg Ana oversight; Did the Planning Commission visit the site prior to approving CUP <br />No. 2022-06 to view the property and surrounding homes? Did the Planning Commission give any <br />consideration to the recent designation of Floral Park as a National Historic District? As stipulated <br />below in the approval documents of CUP No. 2022-06, will the owners be held accountable for <br />obtaining retroactive building permits for the unpermitted ADU and changes made thereto, as <br />well as for the appropriate maintenance/upkeep of the historically important home? This task is <br />still incomplete and, therefore, this project should not be approved. As stipulated below in the <br />approval documents of CUP No. 2022-6, will the City monitor and ensure the home is not used <br />for tours or as a functioning museum/cultural center where festivals for the public occur and what <br />steps before the fact will be taken? What happens when there is an increase in traffic? A very <br />similar situation is happening on Lampson Avenue in Garden Grove, Please contact your <br />colleagues there as their residents have been battling this for over five years. <br />EXCERPTS FROM CUP 2022-9fi apprnyal documents: <br />1. The Maharaja House owners must be h Id in c m 1 a ce with Iheir applicamon statements: <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2022-06 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2221 NORTH HELIOTROPE <br />DRIVE, LOCATED WITHIN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R1) ZONING DISTRICT: <br />a. (Page 5 second paragraph) "Planning staff held various conversations with the property owners <br />and property owner representatives (I.e., architects, engineers, etc.) between early 2022 and <br />early 2024 regarding the unpermitted work, and provided two options which Included removing <br />the unpermitted work and returning the structure back to the original conditions, or going <br />through the City permits to legalize the work. In May 2024, the property owners submitted <br />required building plans to the Planning and Building Agency to legalize the unpermitted work, <br />and convert the structure into an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) for a separate living space and <br />storage. At the time of this report was printed, the building plans were still in building plan check <br />and had not been approved for permit issuance." <br />b. (Page 6 second paragraph) "Therefore, the construction of the proposed pavilion will not result <br />in a change to the neighborhood character or identity. To further ensure that the proposed <br />pavilion will not. negatively affect the neighborhood character or identify (s/b Identity). staff Is <br />recommending condition of approval prohibiting theuse. of.the. structure and the site for anv <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.