My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2024 10:01:45 AM
Creation date
11/15/2024 8:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
34
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Amber Matas <br />To: eComments. PBA <br />Subject: Objection to the variance request for historic landmark at 2221 N Heliotrope <br />Date: Saturday, March 26, 2022 6:54:15 PM <br />Good afternoon <br />I am officially sending in an objection to the variance requested at 2221 Heliotrope. <br />My credentials are as follows- a Floral Park resident and a Senior Vice President of Design <br />and Construction for a major Southern California <br />company. I have managed architecture, design, and construction for multiple historically <br />designated neighborhoods and projects over the pst 25 years. <br />The overall height is far beyond what would be considered within code and moreover, is not in <br />line with with the historical nature of the home as it is on the registry. <br />Allowing this structure at this height is not only an eyesore to the neighborhood, but it <br />expressly is against the Mills Act. <br />Moreover, the larger concern would be that the initial structure granted the historical <br />designation (I.e. the home itself) is sadly neglected. The paint, fencing and landscaping is all <br />in need of repair and allowing funds to go towards this build would divert from the <br />preservation of the home itself. <br />And if the funds are being donated by outside community to erect the structure, the concern <br />would be what is the intent of the structure? <br />Frankly, we feel this is slowly being transformed into a religious retreat or gathering <br />place/event space as multiple events are held here and our neighborhood is not an event <br />center. <br />Amber Matas, PMP <br />714-553-1188 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.