Laserfiche WebLink
Although the proposed CUP is a land use application within the purview and <br />review authority of the Planning Commission, Planning Division staff did <br />provide an extensive historical analysis, including a review of compatibility <br />with the Floral Park National Historic District, which is included in Exhibit 3 <br />of the staff report. Therefore, the Planning Commission did consider the <br />recent national district designation, as it relates to their land use review <br />authority. <br />The property owner has taken the necessary actions to rectify the <br />unpermitted alterations and come into compliance with all PBA building <br />permitting requirements. Building plan check corrections were issued to the <br />property owner on July 2, 2024. At the time this report was printed, the <br />property owner has yet to re -submit the building plans. The property owner's <br />ADU project is still in building plan check and it has not been approved for <br />permit issuance. <br />Lastly, cultural and/or museum uses are not a permitted use in the single- <br />family residential (R1) zone. Moreover, the use is not consistent with the <br />underlying general plan land use designation of Low -Density Residential <br />(LR-7). Any use of the property in violation of the SAMC or the City's <br />General Plan would be subject to the code enforcement action. A condition <br />has been added to the approval prohibiting the use of the structure and the <br />site for any commercial purposes, including but not limited to, tours, <br />museum use, festivals, etc. <br />Remaining comments in Appeal Application No. 2024-01 are excerpts from the August <br />26, 2024, Planning Commission staff report. Therefore, this analysis acknowledges the <br />included informational excerpts and concludes the appeal analysis with no further <br />responses. <br />Resolution No. 2024-xx <br />Page 16 of 16 <br />