My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Item 34 - Public Hearing - Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23’-4” Tall Accessory Building (2221 N Heliotrope Drive)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2024 10:01:45 AM
Creation date
11/15/2024 8:51:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
34
Date
11/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal Application No. 2024-01 for Construction of a 23'-4" Tall Accessory Building (2221 <br />N Heliotrope Drive) <br />November 19, 2024 <br />Page 6 <br />Park as a National Historic District. Moreover, the appellant provides further <br />questions about whether the owners will be held accountable for obtaining <br />retroactive building permits for an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), as well as <br />maintenance/upkeep of the "historically important home," and how the City will <br />monitor the site to ensure it is not being used as a cultural center. <br />Staff notes that the appellant does not provide any evidence to substantiate that the <br />proposed project would adversely impact the community, pursuant to Section 41-638 of <br />the SAMC. Specifically, the appellant does not provide evidence that the project will be <br />a detriment to the general wellbeing of the neighborhood or the community; detrimental <br />to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; <br />would adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development <br />of property in the surrounding area; does not comply with the regulations and conditions <br />specified in this chapter for such use; and would adversely affect the general plan of the <br />city or any specific plan applicable to the area of the proposed use. Nevertheless, a <br />comprehensive response on the appeal items previously outlined has been prepared <br />and can be found in Exhibit 6. <br />Site and Project Background <br />The site contains a historical structure known as the Maharajah House, which was <br />constructed in 1938 and was placed in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties <br />("Register") and categorized as "Landmark" in 2003. The property qualifies for listing in <br />the Santa Ana Register under Criterion 1 for its exemplification of the Art Moderne <br />variant of the Moderne style and under Criterion 4b, for its association with a foreign <br />ruling family, the Holkars of Indore, India. Moreover, the property satisfied two criteria <br />for landmark categorization: "unique architectural significance" as an example of the Art <br />Moderne style in Santa Ana and "historic/cultural significance" as the residence of a <br />sitting ruler of Indore. The Maharajah House is also listed as contributor to the Floral <br />Park National Historic District. Lastly, the City of Santa Ana entered into a Mills Act <br />Agreement with the property owners in 2014. For reference, additional historic <br />information on the property can be found in Exhibit 3. <br />The subject site was previously improved with a freestanding one-story garden house <br />with a porch, built in 2004. Similar to the proposed pavilion, the garden house was <br />dismantled, shipped from Vietnam, and reconstructed on the property. The garden <br />house was built in Vietnam circa 1847 and was brought over piece by piece to Santa <br />Ana. At the time, the property owners also imported a bell tower with three 18th- and <br />19th-century bells, marble sculptures, a collection of 11th-century foo dogs, and a water <br />feature. The building permits for the garden house were reviewed and processed <br />administratively by City staff. Pursuant to Chapter 30 of the SAMC, on -site accessory <br />structures can be reviewed and approved administratively by staff. Therefore, the <br />structure did not require discretionary review due to the fact that it is considered an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.