My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Response to Comments - Agenda Item No. 35
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
11/19/2024
>
Response to Comments - Agenda Item No. 35
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:52:28 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 4:52:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana City Council <br />November 18, 2024 <br />Page 13 <br />The City Has Refused To Provide Evidence Surrounding its Treatment of STRs and the <br />Basis for BanningSTRsin Violation of the California Public Records Act <br />In April 2024, a Public Records Act request was filed with the City in an effort to understand what <br />motivated the Citya total ban on STRs.Oversixmonths later, the City has still not <br />produced a response to the PRA.(See PRA 24-715.)The City has responded to over 1,000 PRA <br />requestAs such, the <br />Cityappears to be concealing the true motivations for seeking to ban all STRs in the City. To date, <br />the City has not provided anyevidence to support its claim that STRs in the City have a negative <br />impact on public health, safety,and welfare, if any even exists. <br />We strongly urge theCouncil to refrain from taking any action on the proposed STR prohibition <br />until the City has responded to the Public Records Act request. <br />Proposed Path Forward <br />We urge the City Council to rescind the currentlyeffective andillegallyadopted Ordinance, reject <br />the Amended Ordinance,and direct Staff to work with all stakeholders to develop a new ordinance <br />that authorizes STRs to continue operating subject to reasonable regulations. Specifically, we <br />City <br />recommend establishing an <br />Thistype of regulation strikes the appropriate balance while maintaining the ability of STR owners <br />to operate in the City. <br />While the Rental Alliance is ready and willing to work with the City, for the reasons summarized <br />above, should the City Council move forward with adopting the Amended Ordinancewe will <br />challenge this action in court to protect rights. <br />Sincerely, <br />GAINES & STACEY LLP <br />Alicia B. Bartley <br />By <br />ALICIA B. BARTLEY <br />cc:Jose Montoya (Via Email -jmontoya@santa-ana.org) <br />Amy Hoyt (Via Email -Amy.Hoyt@bbklaw.com) <br />Hannah Park (Via Email -Hannah.Park@bbklaw.com) <br />Attachments <br />Attachment ACAJA Environmental Services, Potential Significant Environmental <br />Effects of Banning Short-Term Rentals in the City of Santa and Requirement Require <br />Additional Environmental Analysis Under CEQA,November 14, 2024. <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.