Laserfiche WebLink
I result in no possibility of significant environmental impacts prior to determining that Ordinance <br /> 2 No. NS-3061 is not a"project"under CEQA. Davidon Homes v. Cty. of San Joe, 54 Cal.AppAth <br /> 3 106, 119-120 (1997). <br /> 4 65. The City failed to satisfy its burden to prove, to a certainty, that Ordinance No.NS- <br /> 5 3061 will result in no possibility of significant environmental impacts and is therefore not a <br /> 6 "project" subject to CEQA. No other exemption applies to the Project. Therefore, the City had a <br /> 7 mandatory obligation to complete an initial study, and based on the results of such study, a duty to <br /> 8 prepare an environmental impact report, analyze all areas of potential significant environmental <br /> 9 impact, analyze a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project, and mitigate the Project's impacts <br /> 10 to the maximum extent feasible, all as required by law. <br /> 11 66. The City's errors were prejudicial because the failure to comply with the law <br /> 12 resulted in a critical deprivation of the benefits of the public information and public participation <br /> 13 purposes of CEQA. The conclusion that Ordinance No. NS-3061 was not a project deprived the <br /> 14 City of the information needed to produce reasoned decision-making and public participation. <br /> 15 67. A 180-day statute of limitations applies to Petitioner's CEQA claim under Public <br /> 16 Resources Code Section 21167(d) due to the City's failure to file a proper notice of exemption. <br /> 17 Specifically, the City filed a notice of exemption for Ordinance No. NS-3061 on April 5, 2024, <br /> 18 before the ordinance was finally approve by the City on April 16, 2024. A notice of exemption <br /> 19 filed before project approval does not trigger the CEQA limitations period. Coalition for Clean <br /> 20 Air v. City of Visalia (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 408, 423. <br /> 21 68. Petitioner has caused a Notice of Commencement of Action to be served on <br /> 22 Respondents, as required by Public Resources Code Section 21167.5. <br /> 23 69. Petitioner will have caused a copy of this pleading to be served on the Attorney <br /> 24 General not more than 10 days after the commencement of this proceeding, as required by Public <br /> 25 Resources Code Section 21167.7 and Code of Civil Procedure Section 388. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> VERTFTED PETTTTON FOR WRTT OF MANDATE <br /> 19 AND COMPLATNT <br />