My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item #15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2024
>
12/03/2024
>
Correspondence - Item #15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2024 3:06:38 PM
Creation date
12/2/2024 3:22:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
15
Date
12/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana City Council <br /> November 18, 2024 <br /> Page 13 <br /> The City Has Refused To Provide Evidence Surrounding its Treatment of STRs and the <br /> Basis for Banning STRs in Violation of the California Public Records Act <br /> In April 2024, a Public Records Act request was filed with the City in an effort to understand what <br /> motivated the City's pursuit of a total ban on STRs. Over six months later, the City has still not <br /> produced a response to the PRA. (See PRA 24-715.) The City has responded to over 1,000 PRA <br /> requests filed after the PRA seeking information about the City's treatment of STRs. As such, the <br /> City appears to be concealing the true motivations for seeking to ban all STRs in the City. To date, <br /> the City has not provided any evidence to support its claim that STRs in the City have a negative <br /> impact on public health, safety, and welfare, if any even exists. <br /> We strongly urge the Council to refrain from taking any action on the proposed STR prohibition <br /> until the City has responded to the Public Records Act request. <br /> Proposed Path Forward <br /> We urge the City Council to rescind the currently effective and illegally adopted Ordinance,reject <br /> the Amended Ordinance, and direct Staff to work with all stakeholders to develop a new ordinance <br /> that authorizes STRs to continue operating subject to reasonable regulations. Specifically, we <br /> recommend establishing an enforcement and transient occupancy tax ("TOT") regime for STRs. <br /> This type of regulation strikes the appropriate balance while maintaining the ability of STR owners <br /> to operate in the City. <br /> While the Rental Alliance is ready and willing to work with the City, for the reasons summarized <br /> above, should the City Council move forward with adopting the Amended Ordinance we will <br /> challenge this action in court to protect our client's rights. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> GAINES & STACEY LLP <br /> atkia ic% Xm#&# <br /> By <br /> ALICIA B. BARTLEY <br /> cc: Jose Montoya (Via Email - jmontoyaksanta-ana.org) <br /> Amy Hoyt(Via Email - Amy.Hoytgbbklaw.com) <br /> Hannah Park (Via Email - Hannah.Parkkbbklaw.com) <br /> Attachments <br /> Attachment A — CAJA Environmental Services, Potential Significant Environmental <br /> Effects of Banning Short-Term Rentals in the City of Santa and Requirement Require <br /> Additional Environmental Analysis Under CEQA, November 14, 2024. <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.