Item 19 - Resolution Repealing Resolution No. 2019-107 Regarding 2525 N Main St.

Home Browse Search

LS 11.19.19 session to overview the Project and fifty-eight (58) verbal comments were receivedtwenty-five (25) in support; thirty (31) in opposition and two (2) neutral) and eleven (11) written comments were received (two (2) in support and nine (9) in opposition); and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a dulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, seventy-nine (79) members of the public spoke on the item, thirty (30) speakers supported the project, forty-eight (48) opposed it and one speaker was neutral. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council not certify the EIR or adopt the findings, the statementofoverridingconsiderationsandthemitigationmonitoringandreportingprogramanddenytheProject; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General PlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 and solicited comments on the EIR. At the meeting, sixty-one (61) members of the public spoke ontheitem, thirty-eight (38) speakers supported the project, twenty (20) speakers opposeditandthree (3) speakers were neutral and the public hearing was continued to the next regular adjourned City Council meeting on February 19, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 19, 2019, the City Council continued to conduct thedulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, Development Agreement No. 2018-01, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-06, and Amendment Application No. 2018-10 andsolicitedcommentsontheEIR. At the meeting, one hundred and thirty-one (131) members of the public spoke on the item, twenty-six (26) speakers supported theprojectandonehundredandfive (105) speakers opposed it. Furthermore, one hundredandsixty-six (166) written comments were received with nine (9) in support and one hundred and fifty-seven (157) in opposition. After hearing all relevant testimony fromstaff, the public and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted that the applications go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration after furtherconsultationwiththecommunity; and WHEREAS, in June 2019, the applicant submitted a revised plan consisting ofdevelopment347multi -family units (59 dwelling units per acre), with 642 parking spaces1.85 parking spaces per unit) and parking capacity at 2.0 spaces per unit, within a 4- story residential building wrapped around a five -level parking structure with an amenitydeckonthesixth -level, private open space, and redesigned the intersection of MainStreetandWalkieWay/Santiago Park Drive to provide access to the project on a 5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, on August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a dulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheJuneRevisedPlan. At the meeting, seventy- seven (77) members of the expressed opposition; nine (9) supported the project, and Resolution No. 2019-107 Page 5 of 11