My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - 21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
02/04/2025
>
Correspondence - 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2025 7:58:58 AM
Creation date
2/4/2025 11:50:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 4, 2025 <br /> Santa Ana City Council <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> Re: Agenda Item #21 - Reconvening of Sanctuary Policy Advisory Group <br /> Dear Mayor Valerie Amezcua and Santa Ana City Council Members, <br /> As always, we are enthusiastic about supporting policies that ensure local resources do not go <br /> towards immigration enforcement. Residents deserve the reassurance of knowing that local <br /> leaders will not allow taxpayer dollars to be co-opted for Trump's mass deportation agenda. <br /> We write to remind the Council of a few important issues that still need attention to ensure that <br /> sanctuary is truly upheld for everyone in Santa Ana: <br /> - While efforts to reaffirm and build on Santa Ana's sanctuary ordinance are highly <br /> encouraged, we do not recommend attaching Santa Ana's Immigration Legal Defense <br /> Fund to the Sanctuary Policy Advisory Group. We would like these two matters to be <br /> addressed separately. The Fund has historically suffered gaps in outreach and services <br /> that remain unaddressed, particularly in relation to the City's Southeast Asian refugee <br /> community members.' Seeing as the Fund's current provider was the only bidder for the <br /> next Fund contract, the Fund should first be restructured to 1) increase the scope of <br /> services and 2) expand outreach to communities not currently serviced before advancing <br /> any process that would result in granting the current provider the contract again. <br /> - Our concerns with the Immigration Legal Defense Fund translate into suggestions <br /> regarding the proposed reconvening of and updates to the Sanctuary Policy Advisory <br /> Group. We hope that the Advisory Group will reflect the diversity of communities <br /> impacted by the threat of deportation- including the local Vietnamese community, <br /> which remains extremely disproportionately unprotected under state law from ICE <br /> transfers-and we are optimistic that the Council will ensure the Advisory Group is <br /> representative of these various perspectives.2 <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Harbor Institute for Immigrant & Economic Justice <br /> El Centro Cultural de Mexico <br /> VietRISE <br /> ' Brazil,Ben. "Santa Ana approves more funding for deportation defense fund,"Los Ange/es Times, June 17,2021. <br /> https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/entertainment/story/2021-06-17/deportation-defense-fund <br /> 2 In 2024,over 90 percent of individuals with immigration detainers in Orange County Sheriff's Department custody who were born <br /> in Vietnam were not protected under California state law from being referred and/or transferred to Immigration and Customs <br /> Enforcement.See Do,Mai N."Safeguarding Which Communities?An Analysis of the Orange County Sheriff's Department's <br /> Continued Collusion with Immigration &Customs Enforcement,"January 2025.https://h orb orinstituteoc.ora/ocsdicetransfers2024/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.