My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
03/04/2025
>
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2025 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 9:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
17
Date
3/4/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 2 Planning Context 2.1 Background and Need for Plan <br />Former Bristol Corridor Redevelopment Plan <br />On December 4, 1989 the City of Santa Ana adopted a <br />redevelopment plan for the area referred to as the Bristol <br />Corridor. The project area included parcels on either side of <br />Bristol Street extending from Central Avenue on the south to <br />the northernmost edge of the Bristol Marketplace on the <br />north (i.e. just south of 21st Street). Along Bristol Street, the <br />average width of the development area was approximately <br />750 feet. At First Street and 17th Street, the development <br />area extended east and west along both sides of these two <br />cross streets. <br />The Bristol Street Corridor is a major north -south corridor <br />through the City of Santa Ana. The street, which is designated <br />as a Major Arterial Highway in the Orange County Master Plan <br />of Arterial Highways (MPAH), serves as a vital north -south <br />transportation link which has regional as well as local <br />significance. The roadway also serves as the designated truck <br />route through the central section of Santa Ana. Consistent <br />with the high levels of traffic that move through the area, land <br />use patterns along the Corridor reflect the importance of the <br />area within the City's overall urban fabric, The City of Santa <br />Ana General Plan Circulation Element shows the corridor <br />having four major commercial nodes distributed along the <br />length of the corridor; South Bristol Center, North Bristol <br />Center, College Center, and an extension of the Civic Center <br />District. These commercial areas are intended as mixed use <br />development areas whose primary function is to provide retail <br />Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan <br />March 2018 <br />services in support of surrounding neighborhoods but which <br />also provide recreational, cultural and educational facilities <br />and activities, employment. Residential neighborhoods fill the <br />areas that separate the four District Centers. <br />Historically, the need for the Bristol Corridor Redevelopment <br />Plan arose out of the fact that the area was not physically or <br />economically meeting its designated potential as either a <br />major transportation or commercial corridor, Overall, the <br />Corridor suffered from negative physical and visual <br />characteristics typically associated with strip development. <br />Large sections of the Corridor were depressed or economically <br />failing. As development occurred over the years, the land use <br />pattern became increasingly haphazard as residential lots <br />fronting the Corridor have been converted to various <br />commercial and office type uses. Development standards <br />along the Corridor varied widely, compounding the perception <br />of disorder. <br />Prior to the 1990s, many of the older development areas were <br />in poor physical condition, and the economic incentive was <br />absent to renovate and upgrade these properties. At that <br />time, Bristol Street itself no longer had adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the traffic volumes. During peak -hour periods <br />the Corridor suffered from significant congestion with many <br />segments and intersections operating at levels of service <br />which were below acceptable urban standards. This <br />congestion not only causes annoying delays for traffic, but also <br />resulted in an increased occurrence of traffic accidents and <br />injuries. <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.