My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
73-068
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1973
>
73-068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:35:16 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
73-68
Date
6/25/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
°i'|.nm~:: Jo Audru::l,,y~ ].;x¢.c:utlve <br />'fo: ,_ J_).~X.~..c~o.r.. ,::..:S.~cr.~:__tjjr_y._ <br /> <br />F,o~: {)apartment of lluildi.n; Safety <br /> <br />Resolution No. 73-68 <br /> <br />~ubjccl:_C_o_n~_u_n_i~_~y Redevelo_p..m_ent ARency - Buildin~ ln_~specf, ion Summary <br /> <br />This ~eparCment has completed the survey of all buildings in the <br />Redevelopment FroJect Ares, ~e reports are filed in accordance <br />with the assessors parcel number system. Farcels within a single <br />block are filed together and blocks vlthin a map book area are <br />grouped together. <br /> <br />A master-summary sheet attached bas been prepared indicating the <br />number and percent of substandard buildings in eoch block, in each <br />map book area, and totalled for the entire redevelopn~.nt project <br />area. A map is attached for purposes of identifyin§ Ute location <br />of east block summarized. <br /> <br />In reviewing this data, it should be borne in mind that the inspec- <br />tion ~as made entirely from the exterior of buildings and vas tn- <br />tended to result in a report on the general condition of ~.hg proper- <br />~y. It should be anted tha~ there was a high incidence of masonry <br />business buildin~s rated substandard due to their lack of struc- <br />tural integrity with respect to earthquake resistance. Also, ~ood <br />frame buildings in Fire Zone No. 1 ~ere rated substandard when they <br />were extremely deficient with respect to fire protection. Because <br />there was no attempt to evaluate co.eliance with the respective <br />codes applicable toward each buildin$, ve consider thac ~he p~lmary <br />value end inten~ of ~hts survey was to determine the scneral condi- <br />tion of blocks and areas. <br /> <br />If further detailed analysis of these reports or date is desired, <br />please advise. If you feel that ~he report is adequate in its <br />present form, please advise in o~der that additional copies maybe <br />furnished £or~hatever distribution is determined to be desirable. <br /> <br />Attachment <br /> <br />~endel! s~. Brtl <br /> <br />Director of Building Safety <br /> <br />3/88 DUE TO POOR CONDITION ORIGINAL DESTROYED <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.