Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 8. <br /> <br />(a) <br /> <br />anticipated impacts or objections), In particular <br />the major issues raised when the Local Agency's <br />position is at variance with recommendations and <br />objections raised in the comments must be addressed <br />in detail giving reasons why specific comments <br />and suggestions were not accepted, and factors <br />cf overriding importance warranting an override <br />of the suggestions. <br />Degree of Specificity. The degree of specificity required <br />in an EIR will correspond to the degree of specificity <br />inyolved in the underlying activity which is described <br />in the EIR. <br /> <br /> An £IR on a construction project will <br /> <br />(b) <br /> <br />(c) <br /> <br /> ne,cessarily <br />be more detailed in thE: specific effects of <br />t~e project than will be an EIR on the adoption <br /> <br />of a local general plan or comprehensive zoning <br />ordinance because the effects of-the construction <br /> <br />can be predicted with greater accuracy. <br /> <br />An EIR on projects such as the adoption or amendment <br />of a comprehensive zoning ordinance or a local general <br />plan should focus on the secondary effects that can <br />be &xp~c~ed to follow from the adoption, but the EIR <br /> <br />need not be as detailed as an EIR on the specific <br /> <br />const¥ection projects that might follow. <br /> <br />The requirements for an EIR on a local general plan <br />or element thereof will be s.atisfi~d__by'}he general <br /> <br />-35- <br /> <br /> <br />