My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
74-120
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1974
>
74-120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:35:02 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
74-120
Date
8/5/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
32. Problem Statement <br /> <br />Per ~he Region T CCCJ~ 1973 Regional Plan~ Orange County has the <br />most severe drug abuse problems of any County in the State. In <br />th~s County, drug oriented problems relate to approximately 40~ ' <br />of ali. major crimes committed. For this reason this category of <br />5rug abuse has been assigned the top priority in Region:T (Orange <br />County's CCCJ des!gnat$on) problem planning and priority. A <br />comprehensive fully-integrated effort is necessary in order to <br />solve this very serious problem. The severity of the drug abuse <br />problem in Orange County is indJcate~ below: (1979 statistics <br />nor available at time proposal prepared.) <br /> <br />1) Orange County's 23 polic~ agencies ma~e a total of 14,351 <br /> narcotics arrests in 1971~ an increase of 782 over the <br /> previous year. This represents an increase of 3~, compared <br /> with a Statewide ~ecrease of 6.3~ (figure 3). <br /> <br />in 1970~ 53~ of al!. adult felony eases arrested in the County <br />were for narcotics misuse. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />4)' <br /> <br />Arrests constitute only a small portion of the total drug <br />abuse D~oble .... Sur'~rejs s,o,,; that of the county's f~)~roxi- <br /> ~ ~ , ~ -~ ~' .... ~- ~t least 85,000 now in <br />m~tel'y 250~000 .~e~on(k,r~ ,~ tud..n~s, <br />shcool h~xe ~r_ed illegel drugs at leas~ once~ and a~ least <br />1~5~000 m~y be cla~.s~f~ea as. curre%t .users. <br /> <br />Over 27~ of total drug arrests in'valve persons under 1.8 <br />years of age. More than 400 secondary school, students were <br />ex~elled during thc 1970-71 school year for. drug abuse <br />offenses (Figure 2_'). Th~s ~s of even greater significence <br />when Jt is noted, fiz'st~ that only a small fracCioa (].0~) <br />of those :invo!ved.w:ith di'u~s are identJ.:~ie{~. Combining the <br />above percentages indicates that the 400 students expel!cd for <br />c]rug offenses constitutes only 9~ of the to~al est~r.,sted <br />m~mber of users.' This'figure is calculated ss 447~4~, which <br />is in remarkable agreement with the figure of 45,000 pre-. <br />se:~ted Jn (3) above .as that indicated by independent surveys. <br /> <br />5) Mo}~e th,':~n 1~2C. 0 patients f~*op Oran[~e Courd:y a.re admitted <br /> annually to Hetropolit~n Sta'te l[os!x~tal for wi-hhdraws! <br /> detoxification 'treatment. This number, of coui, se~ repre-- <br /> sents on].y a fraction of the 8ddic'f; population. <br /> for exavp]e~ ~ndica'[e there are ~'t ler~st 5~[)Oq hero~n ,'~dd. icts <br /> in the County. <br /> <br />6) Nstim~tes place the to~a]_ cost of etlf'orcement of law <br /> to ~.[(cAoJ and d~i'USC l~n ()l'{)N[~c County 8~, ) "~ ' <br /> <br />the ::;t:-~t~:n:~::~. in LS(R" (F]sur'es ]., 3, 5 e 6). <br /> <br />1] <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.