|
[119.t
<br />
<br />R-3 District~ to +~, P-PK District, and to mod/fy the existing C-1 and C-2 Districts by
<br />adding PI( thereto, reference ¢--.!ssion initiated amendment application. On motion of
<br />
<br />Jerome, seconded by Markel and carried, a notice was ordered published
<br />
<br />Amenament
<br />Planning Commission
<br />initiated
<br />
<br />the date of public heaz~_-~= on November 5th, 1956.
<br />
<br />C~caticel was read from the Planning ~,~.lssion su~w.~tting Resolution No. 1059
<br />mending the reclassification of property located on the north side of Walnut Street,
<br />Maple Avenue to Cedar Street, from the R-3 District to the P-PK District, reference
<br />
<br />initiated amendment application. On motion of Councilman ~e~;.-~, seconded
<br />
<br />by Markel and carried, a notiue was ordered published setting the date of public hearing
<br />
<br />Amendment
<br />Planning C_~.mission
<br />initiated
<br />
<br />on November 5th, 1956.
<br />
<br />~s~.,inication was read fr~m the pla,,~,E C~.a~Sion sul~nitting Resolution No. 1060
<br />recommending the reclassification of property located on both sides of Bristol Street,
<br />to a depth of 150 feet, frc~ Santa Clara Avenue to Delhi Road, frc~ the R-1 District to
<br />the R-2 District, except between Fifth and W-l-ut Streets, where it is proposed to re-
<br />
<br />classify the property frc~ R-2 District to C-i-PK and modify the existing 0-2 District
<br />
<br />by easing Pi( thereto. On motion of Councilman Markel, seconded by Jerome and carried,
<br />
<br />Amendment
<br />Nathan Rubaloff
<br />
<br />a notice was ordered published setting the date of public heariz~ on November 5th, 1956.
<br />
<br />Ccmmmu~ic&tionwas read frc~ the Planning Cm~,~ esion sulm.!tting Resolution No. 1057
<br />
<br />recommending the reclassification of two properties located at the northwest and south-
<br />
<br />west corners at the intersection of Walnut a~ld Bristol Streets, to C-1-PK, instead of
<br />
<br />0-2, as requested; +.bet the property located on the north side of Walnut Street between
<br />
<br />the west side line of property which has been reccm-~ended as C-1-PK District, and
<br />
<br />Avenue, be rezome~[ P-~ ~instead of C-l, as requested; and ~.hat property on the south side
<br />
<br />of Walnut Street f,-~ the west side line of property re~>~nded as C-i-FK District, to
<br />Pacific Avenue, remain as R-1 and R-2 Districts, instead of C-l, as requested. On
<br />
<br />motion of Councllm-n Reinly, seconded by ~ex-v~e and carried, a notice was ordered pub-
<br />
<br />lished setting the date of public hearing as November 5th, 1956, s~ being pursuant to
<br />
<br />the orig1-,l application if that notice is approved by the Attorney, and if not, upon
<br />
<br />Petition
<br />Traffic control and
<br />certain speed zoning
<br />W. of Bristol and
<br />north of 17th St.
<br />(Santiago School)
<br />
<br />the basis of the reccm~aendation of the Planning C~,ission.
<br />
<br />Stanley C. Gould, Jr., representing the Northwest Santa ~,~ H~owners Association, Inc.
<br />presented his letter witha petition signed by ~90 property owners requesting that
<br />certain speed zoning and traffic control zones be established for the safety of the
<br />children attending the Santiago School, together with letter f£<~ the Principal of the
<br />
<br />Santiago School. On motion of Councilman O~andler, seconded by Heinly and carried, the
<br />
<br />Petitions to repeal
<br />Ordinance relating to
<br />parking overnight on
<br />the streets
<br />
<br />petition and letters were received and filed. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded
<br />by Chandler and carried, the matter was referred to the Manager and his c~m,~ ttee for
<br />investigation and report at the next meeting.
<br />
<br />Edward W. Merrill, ~22 South Birch Street, presented petitions signed by approximately
<br />1~00 persons requesting the repeal of the Or~ee relating to the parking of vehicles
<br />overnight on the streets in the residential areas; also a letter signed by Mrs. Ethel
<br />C'rutchfield requesting that her name be removed from the petition. On motion of
<br />m-- Markel, seconded by Reinly and carried, the petition and letter were received and
<br />
<br />filed. Mr. Merrill stated he, with a friend, had counted parked cars on the City
<br />
<br />streets, in his area, and found only a few cars bearing permits, nt~nerous cars without
<br />
<br />permits and s~u` cars parked on lawns, driveways and -~ey8; also, that cars parked in
<br />the s!~eys have been stripped. J.W. ~arl8on, Josephine Potter, David Eeller and Dr. C.
<br />
<br />H. Barrett voiced their objections to the Ord/nance and the payment of permit fees.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|