Laserfiche WebLink
taxable retail sales, rose to historically high levels in 1972 and 1973. The <br />increase in sales exceeded the risc in personal income, as people paid for <br />many expenditures by drawing down personal savings and increasing their <br />consumer debt. The present, economic sluggishness, however, which became <br />evident in the third and fourth quarters of last year, will }lave a dampening <br />effect on virtually all areas of the County's economy. Thus, while total income <br />and retail sales in the County will be greater this year than in 1973, the rates <br />of increase will be somewhat leSs than in the two previous years, and a large <br />part of the gains sill be accounted fei- by inflation. <br /> <br /> Total building in Orange County has recently been registering trends <br />very similar to those of the Southland aa a whole-buoyant activity during 1971 <br />and 1972, followed by a major slowdown in 1973 and into 1974. The key factor <br />in the sharp rise and decline has been housing. Housing shortages in 1971 and <br />1972 (vis-a-vis demand) were met by high levels of building, and in mid-1973 <br />a somewhat overbuilt situation and historically high mortgage interest rates <br />caused housing construction to slow dramatically. An underlying trend has <br />been that, while the cycle in fluctuating rates of building activity in the County <br />paralleled to a certain extent those of the entire region, rapid population <br />inflows into Orange County have necessitated a generally higher level of <br />growth. <br /> <br /> The outlook for the future (after 1975) is bright, barring another major <br />U.S. economic recession or ~epression. Continuing urbanization will domi- <br />nate the growth pattern of Orange County during the next thirty years; the <br />southern portion of the County will absorb the major share of the population <br />growth of the next three decades. Orange County will continue to be a <br />recipient of the urban-economic dispersion pressures in Southern California <br />since it will maintain a comparative advantage in environmental conditions <br />vis-a-vis Los Angeles County. Orange County residents will subscribe in <br />the main to a single family dwelling mode of residence. <br /> <br /> The 1983 Land Use Element of the Unincorporated area, one of the <br />major residential growth areas of the County, will provide a positive and <br />controlling influence in creating a less fragmented pattern of development <br />(the total community development concept). However, while the general <br />plan and the County's growth policy and development strategy will be <br />moderately successful in managing the configuration of growth, it is likely <br />to fail as a controller of the rate timing and ultimate magnitude of growth. <br />The growth rate of the southern portion of the County will be influenced more <br />by the actions of the City of Irvine in its attempt to control growth and <br />decisions to lo~ate a major manufacturing or governmental employment <br />complex in the south than by the general plan. <br /> <br /> Santa Ana will continue to grow as the County's <br />governmental, financial, and professional office center. <br />Retail outlets supportive of the office center will prosper, <br />but the City's downtown area is not likely to become a <br /> <br />000031. <br /> <br /> <br />