My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75-057
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1975
>
75-057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
75-57
Date
5/5/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the City. The major problem for thc present and likely future residents <br />of Santa Aha is that a disproportionate percentage of the population will not <br />be qualified for the jobs that are likely to be available. This means a <br />continuation of the existing situation; the more skilled and better paid <br />workers coming into Santa Aha from more desirable adjacent residential <br />areas. <br /> <br />DEMAND FACTORS <br /> <br />POPULATION: There are two components of population growth: natural <br />increase and migration. Natural increase is the net added population result- <br />ing from the number of births minus the number of deaths. <br /> <br /> As illustrated in Table IV-3 the County's rate of natural increase in <br />1960 was 20 per 1,000 persons. In the last few years, the rate has droppedto <br />9 per 1,000 persons, resulting in an average annual increase of 14, 535 <br />persons. Variation in the birth rate is the critical component of natural <br />increase. The national birth rate has dropped from 2.4 in 1960, to 1.8 in <br />1973. The trend toward a lower birth rate can be expected to continue for <br />the near future. The probable range of the natural increase for Orange <br />County in the next five years is between 14, 000 and 15,000 per year. <br /> <br /> The City of Santa Ana's rate of natural increase in 1960 was 22 per <br />1,000 persons. As in the case of the County, Santa Ana's rate has dropped, <br />but not nearly as much. The trend toward a lower birth rate has reduced the <br />City's birth rate to 23 per 1,000 persons in 1973, as compared to 31 per 1,000 <br />persons in 1960. The reduction in birth rates have resulted in an overall <br />reduction in the number of persons per household in Santa Aha as well as <br />the County. <br /> <br /> Will this trend toward lower birth rates persist ? Some believe that this <br />is a temporary dip caused by the sudden impact of new birth control techniques. <br />They hypothesize that marriage and child rearing are only being postponed to <br />later ages, and that in a few years the dip will be over and a new cycle of <br />later child bearing will continue with a moderate birth rate of around 2.6. <br /> <br /> Others contend that the low birth rate will persist and that it is a very <br />significant indicator of a rapidly changing life style. This new life style is <br />often referred to as the "new urban life style." The new urban life style is <br />characterized by small family size, single adults, childless couples, and <br />one-parent-one child families. It is also highly mobile <br />and fluid, living and working around the clock. <br /> <br /> Migration is the major component of the County's <br />net increase. <br /> <br />0000 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.