My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75-057
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1975
>
75-057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
75-57
Date
5/5/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table V-1 compares the growth of the housing stock in <br /> relation to population. While the population of Santa Aha was <br /> increasing by 56 percent from'1960 to 1970, the housing stock <br /> increased by only 50 percent. This population growth created <br /> considerable pressure for new housing. Between 1970 and 1974, <br /> the population increased by 17 percent, and housing units <br /> increased by 21 percent. However, to a large degree, this <br /> fluctuation in the ratio of housing to population growth is <br /> the effect of a decline in the City's birth rate. As reflected <br /> in Table V-2, the birth rate of residents in Santa Ana dropped <br /> from 30.61 births per 1,000 persons in 1960 to 21.42 births <br /> i~ 1973. This had the effect of lowering the persons per house- <br /> hold from 3.18 in 1960 to 3.06 in 1974. <br /> ; <br /> Data from the 1960 Census referred to earlier, indicate <br />that five cities--Anaheim, Buena Park, Fullerton, Garden Grove, <br />and Santa Ana--contain~d more than half of all owner-occupied <br />units in the County valued under $10,000, by 1960 standards. <br />By 1970, these same five cities increased their share of the <br />County's low-priced units to 60 percent. However, by 1970, <br />the standard for Iow-priced dwelling units had shifted from <br />$10,000 to $20,000; virtually no new dwelling units under <br />$10,000 were built between 1960 and 1970. The upward shift in <br />the s.tandards from 1960 to 1970 is due to two factors: an <br />overall, upward shift of the distribution and an increase in <br />the Home Ownership Component of the Consumer Price Index for <br />the Los Angeles-Orange County area. <br /> <br /> While there has been a shift in the distribution Of the <br />lower-valued homes, there have also been changes in the <br />expensive and middle-valued units. These ranges were $20,000 <br />and over and $10,000-$20,000, respectively, in 1960. Due to <br />the shift in the price distribution, the 1970 standards were <br />moved to $35,000 plus and $20,000-$35,000, respectively. As <br />of 174, the cities of Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Seal Beach, <br />Villa Park, Irvine and the unincorporated area of Tustin- <br />Foothills held a disproportionately large share of the most <br />e~pensive homes with regard to their percentage share of the <br />County's total housing stock. While this pattern was evident <br />in 1960 and 1970, the 1974 data show that there was a strong <br />shift to these areas from 1960-1974 with regard to the construc- <br />tion of expensive units. <br /> <br /> While this.moVement was under way, the five cities of <br />Anaheim, Buena Park, Fullerton, Garden Grove and Santa Aha <br />underwent a considerable downward shift from 1960 to 1974 in <br />their proportion of the. County's highest-valued units. This <br />decline from 37 percent to approximately 17 percent had the ' <br />effect of widening the gap between their housing <br />composition and that of neighboring cities and <br />areas with high proportions of expensive dwellings. <br /> <br />000065 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.