My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75-057
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1975
>
75-057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
75-57
Date
5/5/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
offered for sale in Orange County. In 1974, as illustrated in <br />Table V-4, there were 9,352 at an average price of $39,300. <br />However, on1¥ 2,249 (24%) of these units were in the $20,000- <br />$29,999 range. Purchase of these units in this price range <br />requires an income of approximately $10i000 to $15,000. This <br />assumes a 30-year mortgage at 9.0 percent interest and 10 <br />percent down payment. This price range is considered by the <br />report to be in the marketable range for those renters paying <br />from $170 to $250 per month. While this price range of $20,000 <br />to $29,999 is still relatively low in comparison to the pre- <br />~ailing median of $55,500 for single-family homes and $39,300 <br />for planned unit developments, it is, however, still expensive <br />for many families with'children trying to live on incomes <br />below the County average. This group represents a very large.. <br />proportion of those seeking shelter. <br /> <br /> The fact that builders are offering these lower-priced <br />condominium~and townhouse units in spite of considerable price <br />increases in building costs may indicate that they are feeling <br />the push of.an ever-decreasing market for.their dwellings and <br />are now producing lower-priced units in order to accommodate <br />.the demand. The "Marketability by Price Range" data for <br />planned unit developments tends to confirm that the consumer <br />has been responsive to the availability of these lower-priced <br />Units. The.fact that the unsold percentage seems to increase <br />by price of unit may be indicative of the. fact that people <br />seeking shelter in thi~ range also have many single-family <br />units from which to choose. <br /> <br /> Several factors give the planned unit developments a <br />strongly competitive marketing edge against conventional single- <br />family home ownership. They are the factors of no necessary <br />exterior maintenance, the attraction of recreational facilities, <br />average lower acquisition cost and monthly payra~nts, and an <br />attitudinal shift toward fuller utilization of leisure time. <br /> <br /> In <br />shi~ts in <br />from 1960 <br /> <br />general, it can be said that several significant <br />the housing composition took place in Orange County <br />to 1970 and are continuing into 1975: <br /> <br />O <br /> <br />Overcrowded conditions increased from nearly 19,000 <br />dwelling units affecting 60,000 people in 1960 to <br />about 27,000 dwelling units and about 103,000 people <br />in 1970 in Orange County. <br /> <br />O <br /> <br />Disparity in housing valuation by city increased <br />from 1960 to 1970 with a widening of the gap between <br />cities with large proportions of high- <br />and low-valued dwellings. <br /> <br />The prices of new housing have increased <br />conside'rably beyond that of consumer <br /> <br />000075 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.