Laserfiche WebLink
RBSOLUTION NO. 79-137 <br /> <br />percent above zoning code requirements. Traffic egress on <br />Olive Street has been prohibited. It is infeasible to <br />determine the desirability of limited packing or traffic <br />access restrictions on other residential streets at the <br />present time, but such options remain open in the future. <br /> <br /> 4. Increased noise. (EIR ~ 3.5.3) <br /> <br /> Construction related noise will be limited by the <br /> <br />City noise ordinance to acceptable times of the day and <br />week. The closure of Olive Street to site related traffic <br />will avoid the most significant potential incident of <br />traffic related noise. Architectural review of the project <br />design will permit the City to require all feasible noise <br />mitigation measures appropriate for the parking structure <br />and any proposed drive-in teller operation. <br /> <br /> 5. Increased wind jetting. (EIR $ 3.6.) <br /> <br /> Architectural review of the project design will <br /> <br />permit the City to require all feasible wind jetting <br />mitigation measures appropriate for the project. In any <br />event, wind jetting will not be a significant effect of the <br /> <br />proposed project. <br /> <br /> 6. Light and Glare <br />3.7.2.2) <br /> <br />Impacts. (EIR S~ 3.7.1.2 and <br /> <br />The shadow projected by the building has been <br /> <br />reduced correspondingly to the required reduction in <br />proposed building height. Glare has been substantially <br />mitigated by requirements for smoked windows, landscaping, <br />parking structure walls, and lighting restrictions. <br /> <br /> 7. Aesthetic Impact. (EIR S 3.8.2) <br /> <br /> The contrast between the project and the <br /> <br />~esidential neighb(~r~6od is not a demonstrably negative <br />aesthetic effect. Th~ aegthetic reaction to the project <br />will be a matter of individual taste. <br /> <br /> 8. <br /> <br />Police and Fire Impacts (EIR ~ 3.10.4 and 3.10.5) <br /> <br /> <br />