My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
79-137
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1979
>
79-137
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:33:57 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
79-137
Date
8/20/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RBSOLUTION NO. 79-137 <br /> <br /> (3) The accessibility to the civic Center, <br /> the site makes it a likely prospect for develop- <br /> ment by the State or County governments, which <br /> development, if it occurred, would be exempt <br /> from the height limitation and fro~ local <br /> municipal regulation in general. <br /> 10. Extension of the Professional/Administrative <br /> <br /> Designation and Height District II Westward <br /> to Baker Street. (EIR S 5.3) <br /> This alternative would increase significant <br /> <br />environmental effects beyond those of the proposed project. <br /> <br /> 11. Rezor]ing to High Density Residential (EIR S 5.4) <br /> <br /> The subject site, due to its immediate proximity <br /> <br />to the Civic Center, is far more appropriate for <br />administrative or professional office use than for <br />apartments or condominiums. There is no evidence of any <br />significant market demand for high density housing <br />developments on the north side of Civic Center Drive west of <br />Flower. Thus this alternative runs the substantial risk of <br />resulting in no redevelopment or improvement of that area <br />whatsoever. On the other hand, to the extent such market <br />demand may arise, the proposed project would not constrain <br />such residential development west of the subject site. <br /> <br /> 12. Redesign to One-Half Height and Space., (EIR S <br /> <br />5.5) <br /> <br /> The proposed project, as modified by the developer, <br />is a compromise between this alternative and the project as <br />originally proposed. Any degree of reduction in height and <br />size will correspondingly mitigate the adverse effects <br />incident to those factors and this alternative is only <br />illustrative of th~ ~ea of a smaller building. The <br />reductions made b~the developer during the course of <br />environmental and planning review bring the proposed project <br />down to the threshhold of financial viability to the <br /> <br />EXHIBIT <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.