Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 79-221 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OVERRULING <br />AND DENYING PROTESTS AND ~KING CERTAIN <br />FINDINGS . (A.D. 242 - PROGRESSO-hA BONITA & SIXIH-ROSI/A) <br /> CITY OF SkNTA ANA <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this City Council has held and conducted a Public Hearing <br />on the confirmation of the assessments and acceptance of the works <br />of improvement in a special assessment district with the terms and <br />proceedings being conducted pursuant to the provisions of the "Im- <br />provement Act of 1911", being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways <br />Code of the State of California; said special assessment district <br />known and designated as <br /> <br />ASSESSmeNT DISTRICT NO. 242 <br /> <br />(hereinafter re~erred to as the "Assessment District"); and, <br /> <br />W~tEREAS, certain owners 'of property liable to be assessed for cer- <br />tain works of improvement have filed written protests or objections <br />and delivered the same to the Clerk of the Council not later than <br />the hour se.~.for the hearing thereon, and said protests have been <br />presented to the City Council for their consideration, and this <br />Council has proceeded to hear the same and is now ready to proceed <br />with the confirmation of the assessments and acceptance of the <br />works of improvement. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br /> <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br />CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. <br /> <br />SECTION 2. <br /> <br />That all protests and objections of <br />nature be, and the same hereby are, <br />denied. <br /> <br />every kind and <br />overruled and <br /> <br />SECTION 3. <br /> <br />That it is hereby further determined that all pro- <br />perties within the boundaries of the Assessment <br />District do receive a local and direct benefit from <br />the works of improvement and that the assessable <br />costs and expenses have been apportioned and spread <br />against ~the properties within the Assessment Dist- <br />rict in direct proportion to benefits received thereto. <br /> <br />SECTION 4. <br /> <br />That the Engineer's method and formula of assessment <br />spread is equitable and hereby approved by this City <br />Council as being a correct and proper apportionment <br />and distribution of all assessable costs in relation <br />to the benefits received from the works of improve- <br />ment constructed under these proceedings. <br /> <br />APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd <br /> <br />CO NCIK <br /> <br />DAY OF December, 1979 <br /> <br /> <br />