07-20-1959 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Heart~$ Amend Section 9211-M-1 and Section 9212 Districts; future right-of-way lines on 5th, McClay and Grand Nearing Establish setback lines on portions of Lehnhardt Ave., Verano St. and Smeltzer Avenue Ordinance ~ ~ontinued hearing Adoption of fut,_re R/W Lines on l?th Street and on Flower Street Ordinance Variance Application No. ll~4 - Carlos Soto'~' This being the date set for hearings on sme~g Section ~211- N-1 (~anufacturing District)and Section ~ ~-~ (~auufacturing District), and on the establishment of ~ut~re right-of-way lines along Fifth Street, McClay Street and Grand A~enue, it was ~ved by Counctlm~ C~d, seconded by Ball and carried, that the hearings be con- tinued until August 5, 1959 and the City Attorney instructed to furnish the City Council with copies of the Ordinance in regard to amending Sections ~1~ M-1 and 921~ This Being the date set for hearing on the est~blishing of setback lines along portions of Le~hardt Avenue, Verano Street and Smeltzer Awenue; no protests were received and the hearing was declared closed. On motion of Council~- secon~-d by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance entitled: "Ord~--~ce establishing setback lines along portions of Lehnhardt Awenue, Verano Street and ~eltzer Awenue" was lntroduced~ considered and placed on file for second reading. This being the date set for the continued hearing on the adoption of future right- of-way lines along 17th Street from the Sauta Ana l~iver to the east corporate limits, ~t on Fl~er Street, from a point 20~ feet north of the center line of l?th Street to the center line of Fine Street; John L. Sentesy, representing the l?th Street Improwement Association, stmted he had a letter from the Association wherein they desire a elaril'icatton on the following points: 1. In the area proposed for setback, some properties are at present 51' from the center line of l?th Street. Why shouldn't the uniform set-back of 50' be used for the entire street? In the event of additions to existing buildings of this group, will they be permitted to make ¢~es in the rear without mowt~g e~isting building fronts back one foot? 2. In the area between Flower and ~ain, where the encroachment on the 50' set-back is greater, will minor additions to the rear of buildings be permitted without cuttt-g back the front to the 50' line? On motion of Counc~m~ Hubbard, seconded by Hall and carried, the c~nication was received and filed. The ~anager satisfactorily answered the questions as contained in the c~mnieation and as asked by ~r. Sentesy. Nfs. A.C.Keck, 205 South Flower Street, again protested the establishment of future right-of-way lines on Flower Street and presented a petition containing approximately eighty signatures of persona objecting to the proposed setback line. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by w,1 ~ and carried, the petition was received and filed. Patrick Yo,,~er, 910 North Flower Street, asked certain question~ reference the widening of Flower Street and the ~ayor satigfactorlly answered his questions. Dr. G. Wray Crawford, 19~7 Heliotrope Drive, stated he would like a clarification on the establishi~ of future right-of-way lines along l?th Street and if it is necessal~y to have such right-of-way lines; the existing buildings have had ~ermits issued and within the next five or ten years this will encroach upon the proposed right-of-way line. ~r. CrawTord's questions were answered by the Nayor. The hearing was declared closed. On motion of Colictlma~ Hubbard, seconded by w-1l a~d carried, the following Ordinance entitled: "Ordi~ce establishing futul~ right of way lines along Seventeenth Street, Washington Avenue and Flower Street" was introduced, considered and placed on file for second ~ay~r Nei~ly retired from the Chair. Vice-Nayor Hall asst~ed the Chair. On motion of COttUCtlman ~Ould~ seconded by Hubbard and carried, the recommendation of the Planning Cc~nission was approved and Variance Application No. llB4 filed by Carlos and EdubiJes Soto granted to construct a one-story, two-bedroom duplex and a