Laserfiche WebLink
BKS:ms <br />ll/10/80 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 80- 202 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CI~f COUNCIL OF THE CI~ OF <br />SANTA ANA REQUESTING THE COLrNTY COUNSEL OF OP~GE <br />COUNTY TO DEFEND A TAXPAYER'S ACTION BROUGHT <br />AGAINST THE CITY. <br /> <br /> WHEP, E~, an action for refund of property taxes <br />paid was filed in the Superior Court of the County of Orange <br />on October 31, 1980, by Xerox Corporation, et al. against <br />the County of Orange and City of Santa Dana, et al., Case <br />No. 323480; and <br /> <br /> WHEP~EAS, California Revenue and Taxation Code <br />Section 5149 provides as follows: "~_ny city for which <br />county officers collect taxes may provide for the defense by <br />counsel for the county of actions brought against the city <br />under this article, in which event it shall be the duty of <br />such counsel to defend such actions, or the city may provide <br />that such actions shall be defended by its o~zn counsel;" and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />desires to have the County Counsel defend said City in the <br />above-mentioned action pursuant to the above-mentioned code <br />section. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council <br />of the City of Santa Ana: <br /> <br /> 1. That the City of Santa Ana does hereby request <br />the County Counsel to defend said City in the above-mentioned <br />action, Case No. 323480. <br /> <br /> 2. That the Clerk of the Council is hereby <br />directed to deliver a copy of this resolution to the County <br />Counsel of Orange County forthwith. <br /> <br /> ADOPTED this <br />by the following vote: <br /> <br />8th day of December , 1980, <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />NOES: <br /> <br />COUNCII24EN: Griset, Luxembourger, Markel, Serrato, <br /> Ward, Yamamoto <br />COUNCILMEN: None <br /> <br />ABSENT: COUNCI I24EN: Bricken <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />EDWkRD J. C~OPE~_) <br />City Attorney <br /> <br /> <br />