My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
81-029
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1981
>
81-029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:33:30 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
81-29
Date
3/2/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BKS:ms <br />2/20/81 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 81-29 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUESTING THE COUNTY <br />COUNSEL OF ORANGE COUNTY TO DEFEND A <br />TAXPAYER'S ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST <br />THE CITY. <br /> <br /> Wq{EREAS, an action for refund of property taxes <br />paid was filed in the Superior Court of the County of Orange <br />by Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A., against the County of <br />Orange and City of Santa Ana, et al., Case No. 32-93-43 and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, California Revenue and Taxation Code <br />Section 5149 provides as follows: "Any city for which <br />county officers collect taxes may provide for the defense by <br />counsel for the county of actions brought against the city <br />under this article, in which event it shall be the duty of <br />such counsel to defend such actions, or the city may provide <br />that such actions shall be defended by its own counsel;" and <br /> <br /> WHEPdEAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />desires to have the County Counsel defend said City in the <br />above-mentioned action pursuant to the above-mentioned code <br />section. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council <br />of the City of Santa Ana: <br /> <br /> 1. That the City of Santa Ana does hereby request <br />the County Counsel to defend said City in the abovementioned <br />action, Case No. 32-93-43. <br /> <br /> 2. That the Clerk of the Council is hereby <br />directed to deliver a copy of this resolution to the County <br />Counsel of Orange County forthwith. <br /> <br /> ADOPTED this 2nd day of <br />by the following vote: <br /> <br />March , 1981, <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />COUNCILMEN: Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Serrato <br /> <br />NOES: COUNCILMEN: None <br /> <br />ABSENT: COUNCILM~..N: Ward, Markel, Yamam0t0 <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />City Attorney <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.