Laserfiche WebLink
REL:adg <br />3/20/81 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 81-49 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AFFIRMING WITH <br />MODIFICATIONS THE DECISION OF THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTING VARIANCE <br />APPLICATION NO. 80-68 AND GRANTING <br />APPEAL NO. 434 <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held before the <br />City Council of the City of Santa Ana on March 16, 1981, on <br />the action taken by the Planning Commission in granting <br />Variance Application No. 80-68, which application seeks to <br />allow an expansion of a carwash at 1411 Fairv iew in the C1 <br />District; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, prior to taking action on said Variance <br />Application, this Council has reviewed and considered the <br />Negative Declaration for the project, including Initial <br />Study No. IS-80-242. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> 1. That based on such public hearing and on the <br />oral and documentary evidence submitted therein, the City <br />Council does hereby affirm the action of the Planning <br />Commission in granting Variance Application No. 80-68, <br />subject to the same requirements and limitations as imposed <br />by the Planning Commission, except for the deletion of the <br />requirement specified below, and does grant Appeal No. 434. <br /> <br /> 2. That the City Council hereby adopts as its <br />findings of fact for approval of Variance Application No.80- <br />68 that certain "Finding of Fact, Variance Application No. <br />80-68," prepared and submitted by the Planning Commission, <br />on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Council, and <br />incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth; <br />provided, however, that requirement 7.A.2. is deleted <br />therefrom. <br /> <br /> 3. For the reason set forth in the Negative <br />Declaration prepared for this project, the Council approves <br />and adopts the said Negative Declaration and its finding <br />that the project will not have a significant effect on the <br />environment. <br /> <br /> ADOPTED THIS <br />by the following vote: <br /> <br />6th day of April , 1981, <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />NOES: <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER: <br />COUNCILMEMBER: <br /> <br />Bricken, Griset, Luxembourger, Markel, <br />Serrato, Ward <br />Yamamoto <br /> <br />ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: None <br /> <br />ATTEST: <br /> <br />E~WARD J~ CO~PER~_~ <br />CITY ATTORNEY <br /> <br /> <br />