Laserfiche WebLink
REL:adg <br />3/15/82 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 82-59 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA VACATING AN EAST-WEST <br />ALLEY LOCATED NORTH OF FIRST STREET <br />BETWEEN TOWNSEND AND RAITT STREETS <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council heretofore adopted on April <br />5, 1982, Re~olution No. 82- , wherein it declared its <br />intention to vacate, pursuant to and in accordance with the <br />provisions of Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 9 of the <br />Streets and Highways Code of the State of .California, an <br />east-west alley located north of First Street between <br />Townsend and Raitt Streets as specifically described <br />hereinbelow.; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said Resolution gave notice that on May <br />3, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter <br />could be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City of Santa <br />Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, this <br />Council would hear any and all persons interested in or <br />objecting to said proposed vacation of the said alley; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council finds that said Resolution <br />has been published in the manner prescribed by law for the <br />publishing of ordinances of the City; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council further finds that notices <br />of said proposed alley vacation stating the purposes of said <br />Resolution and time and place set for hearing were posted as <br />directed by the Council and required by law; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council at the time and place set <br />for hearing heard any and all persons interested in or <br />objecting to said proposed vacation of said alley, and <br />received and considered all evidence submitted; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council finds from all the evidence <br />submitted that the said alley described in "Exhibit A" <br />attached hereto, is unnecessary for present or prospective <br />public use, based upon the following findings of fact: <br /> <br /> 1. The said alley is not necessary to serve abutting <br />property owners and occupants due to the availability of <br />access to such abutting property from other streets; <br /> <br /> <br />