Laserfiche WebLink
REL:jd <br />5/25/82 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 82-81 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA RULING ON WRITTEN AND ORAL OBJECTIONS <br />TO THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SANTA <br />ANA SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD/FAIRVIEW STREET <br />REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a Redevelopment Plan for the Santa Ana South <br />Harbor Boulevard/Fairview Street Redevelopment Project has <br />been prepared by and for the Redevelopment Commission of the <br />City of Santa Ana, the Community Redevelopment Agency, and <br />the City of Santa Ana; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on June 15, 1982, a duly noticed joint public <br />hearing on the proposed Redevelopment Plan was conducted by <br />the City Council and the Redevelopment Commission; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, any and all persons having any objections to <br />the proposed Redevelopment Plan or who deny the existence of <br />blight in the proposed Project Area, or the regularity of the <br />prior proceedings, were given an opportunity to submit written <br />comments prior to the commencement of the join~ public hearing, <br />or give oral testimony at the joint public hearing, and show <br />cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted; <br />and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council has heard and considered all <br />evidence, both written and oral, presented in support and in <br />opposition to the adoption of the South Harbor Boulevard/Fairview <br />Street Redevelopment Plan for the Project; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Section 1: The City Council finds on the basis of <br />the substantial evidence contained within the Report to the <br />City Council submitted by the Redevelopment Commission of the <br />City of Santa Ana and other substantial evidence in the <br />record that conditions of blight exist within the proposed <br />South Harbor Boulevard/Fairview Street Redevelopment Project, <br />and that written and oral evidence in opposition received at <br />the joint public hearing is not persuasive to the contrary. <br /> <br /> Section 2: The City Council and the Redevelopment <br />Commission have duly complied with all the provisions, re- <br />quirements, and procedures of Articles 4 and 4.5 (commencing <br /> <br /> <br />