|
On motion of CounciLman Gould, seconded by Hubbard and carried, the lowest an~d
<br />
<br />best bid of Howard Supply Company was accepted for Item l, in the total amount of
<br />
<br />$400.33; Item 2~ in the total amount of $292.95; and Item 3, in the total amount
<br />
<br />Bid acceptance
<br />Construct sanitary
<br />sewer in Van Ness St.
<br />end in Sixth St.
<br />Project 8-28
<br />
<br />of $4,137.12, and all other bids rejected.
<br />
<br />A tabulation of bids was presented for the construction of a sanitary sewer in Van
<br />
<br />Ness Street between First and Sixth Streets; and in Sixth Street between Van Ness
<br />
<br />and Ross Streets, Pro~ect S-28, as follows:
<br /> Total
<br />Orange County Construction Company $20,721.50
<br />Leo Weiler Company 22,207.68
<br />De Leon Construction Company 15,349.75
<br />
<br />Bid Bond
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Gould and carried, the lowest and bes'
<br />
<br />bid of De Leon Construction Company was accepted in the total amount of $15,349.75
<br />
<br />Bid acceptance
<br />Reconstruct Grand Ave.
<br />Project 124; and
<br />Chestnut Avenue,
<br />Project C-60
<br />
<br />and all other bids rejected.
<br />
<br />A tabulation of bids was presented for the reconstruction of Grand Avenue, between
<br />
<br />McFadden Avenue and Delhi Road, Project 124; and for the reconstruction of Chest-
<br />
<br />nut Avenue, between Grand Avenue and a point approximately 780 feet west, Project
<br />
<br />C-60, as follows:
<br />
<br />Griffith Company
<br />Sully-Miller Contracting Company
<br />R. J. Noble Company
<br />Cox Bros. Constructic~ Company
<br />
<br /> Total Bid Bond
<br />$71,72U.5© ~-,500.00
<br /> 65,241.00 10%
<br /> 58,43o.oo
<br /> 60, 965. oo
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Gould¢ seconded by Hubbard end carried, the lowest and
<br />
<br />best bid of R. J. Noble Company was accepted at the unit'prices and in the total
<br />
<br />Hearing
<br />Amend.Appl,No.343
<br />C.B.Knickerbocker
<br />
<br />amount' of $58,430.00, and all other bids rejected.
<br />
<br />This being the date set for hearing on Amendment Application No. 343,
<br />
<br />filed by
<br />
<br />C. B. Knickerbocker, ~mending Sectional District Map 7-5-9, to reclassify from the
<br />
<br />"P'; District to the C-2 District, property located on the north side of Eleventh
<br />
<br />Street between Main and Push Streets (~ots 15, 17 and 19) all as shown on Exhibit
<br />
<br />A. A. 343A, where Planning C~mnission recommended denial; no protests were received
<br />
<br />Appeal Appl.No.12
<br />Variance Appl.No.14B9
<br />Loucius Paul Hunter
<br />Reso.No. 61-54
<br />granting Variance
<br />
<br />and the hearing was closed. On motion~of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Brewer aad
<br />carried, the recommendation of the Planning C~mmission was approved, and ~mendment
<br />Application No. 343 denied.
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. 12 of Loucius Paul Hunter was again presented on Variance
<br />
<br />Application No. 1439, wherein Planning Commission recc~mnended denial to add a
<br />
<br />second single family dwelling on an R-1 lot, located at 1510 West Seventh Street,
<br />
<br />in the R-1 District, and the applicant agreed to all conditions as imposed by the
<br />
<br />Planni~ Department and the Department of Public Works. The Council having unani-
<br />
<br />mously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of Councilman Gould~ seconde
<br />
<br />by Brewer and carried~ the following Resolution entitled:
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 61-54 overruling the Zoning Administrator and
<br /> the Planning C~ission and granting Variance Application
<br /> No. 1439, filed by Loucius P. Hunter"
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Appeal Bppl.No.10
<br />ariance Appl.No.1426
<br />harles Wagner Enterprises
<br />eso.No. 61-55
<br />granting Variance
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Stanley C. Gould, Jr.,
<br /> Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer~ A. A. Hall
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Appeal Application No. l0 of Charles Wagner Enterprises was presented on Variance
<br />
<br />Application No. 1426~ wherein the Zoning Administrator recOn~ended denial to build
<br />
<br />a professional office building with less than required off-street parking on prop-
<br />
<br />erty at 2100 North Broadway in the "P" District, and the Planning Department ad-
<br />
<br />vised a revised plot plan had been submitted and recommended approval of Variance
<br />
<br />Application No. 1426, subject to all conditions as set forth in Planning Departme~
<br />
<br />letter of February 28, 1961. 'Attorney John D. Cochran, First Western Bank Buildiz
<br />
<br />
<br />
|