My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
84-070
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1984
>
84-070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:33:00 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
84-70
Date
6/25/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REL:adg <br />6/6/84 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 84-70 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF SANTA ANA DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />APPLICATION NO. 82-20 AND VARIANCE APPLICATION <br />NO. 82-21 TO ALLOW AN OFF-PREMISE ADVERTISING <br />SIGN ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1969-2019 SOUTH <br />RITCHEY STREET <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council held a public hearing on June 4, <br />1984 on Conditional Use Permit Application No. 82-20, to allow <br />an off-premise advertising sign in the M1 District--and on Variance <br />Application No. 82-21, to allow such sign to be installed at <br />variance with zoning regulations restricting the installation <br />of such signs near freeways and restricting the height of such <br />signs, on property located at 1969-2019 South Ritchey Street, <br />which applications were brought before this Council by Appeal <br />No. 479, following their denial by the Planning Commission; <br /> <br /> NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> 1. Based on the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hear- <br />ing, this Council finds and determines as follows: <br /> <br /> (a) The proposed sign is inconsistent with develop- <br />ments and improvements in the vicinity and will create a view <br />deleterious to the area. <br /> <br /> (b) The proposed sign may create a significant <br />traffic hazard since it is designed to draw the attention of <br />motorists on the Newport Freeway. <br /> <br /> (c) There are no special circumstances pertaining <br />to the subject property which cause any unreasonable hardship <br />on the property owner in being required to comply with the <br />zoning regulations regarding the size and location of off- <br />premise advertising signs. <br /> <br /> (d) The proposed sign is inconsistent with the <br />policies and goals of the "Scenic Corridors" elements of the <br />General Plan. The Newport Freeway is a "scenic corridor" <br />within the scope of such element and one of the objectives <br />of such element is to create a positive visual image for the <br />City. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.