Laserfiche WebLink
-- 027 <br /> <br />VXrX. <br /> <br />ASS botndary to the Orange/San Diego County line; tAence <br />aLoog the Orange County line to where it: lntarsecta the <br />the proposed Id paisa Avenue as shown on said Plamt:e~ Plan <br />llighuays. <br /> <br />excluding Zone A as described above. <br /> <br />A, lMt:erminat:ion og Fee Progcan's Share o£ Corridor Cos~ <br /> <br />The gi=st step in calculating CAe gee program ·hare o£ the cor.-idor <br />cost: was to determine the percentage si corridor user t:cip ends th·~. <br />~rig£nice sc end vithin ~he area o£ bene£1t: ~aiab are attributable co <br />new gro~h. Trip inforuat:lon derived £ro. ~he ~CCS truvel demand <br /> <br />the developer· share and nult:iplied by the to~al corridor cost t:o <br />der:ermine t:he gee program s~are o£ coe~.t aa ·ho~n in Table VXZZ-I. <br /> <br />The gee Program share o~ corridor cost: Wa· then ·sparer:ed into amount:s <br />repraeent:ing direct: and indirec~ bene£1ta to t:he bene£ic zones (A & ~ <br />.Zones) be·md ~POn pea~ ho~r and nos-peak hour t:ravel chacact:ecis~ics. <br />Ale, foxiest:ely six'~y-one percent1 (61%1 o£ corridor t:rips ace expect:ed <br />,to occur during nofl-pea~ travel hours, taus representing a measure o~ <br />tAe direct: benegit: £r~m tAe corridors. Approximately thicty-n£ne <br />percent:1 (3~) o£ corridor trips ars expect:ed ~o occur durin~ pea~ <br />hours o£ t:ravel~ taus repreeen~ing laanened congest:ion on the <br />remaining t:rann.--~rt:ation system. This syscom relie£ ia de£ined as <br />iodirec~ benefit:. <br /> <br /> bene£1ta he,Mean ~he A and B scoeL Tbs port:ion o~ ~as p~ogram share <br /> rep~eamnt:lng direct: beflelit: ~ divided bet,~en the A and · zones <br /> based upon tAe percentage o£ corridor uamr t:=ipe due to grov*.~ within <br /> each zone. The port:ion o~ developers share repreBonhing indi:ec~ <br /> benegit: was dis~lb~t:ed betnean the A and a zones based upon the <br /> percentage o~ total t:rip ends on the ~ranaporta~ion 8yst:am within an¢~ <br /> zoM. The gees got ~e A and B ~coes, there£oce, ioclede a measure og <br /> both direct: and lndtmect: bene£1~s received by each BOM. w'thioit:s Pll <br /> and Vl~ show the method in ,~xi~ these cal~ulat:£ons were made. <br /> <br />l~alt:rans, IAi~S 1976 U~ben Rural Survey. <br /> <br />-LS- <br /> <br /> <br />