Laserfiche WebLink
011 <br /> <br />FOR <br /> <br /> can no lofl~er be expected Chat facilities such a· CAe San ~oaquiA Hills <br />T~anspo~Cat£on Corcido: (So'IlTC) and F~ocAill/Baste~n T~ansportJtion Corridors <br />(F/ETC) can be fully ~ua~e~ £rom ~he tradic£onel revenue sources used to <br /> <br />fund£ng sources muse ~ece~oce ~ ~o~ ~ ~ese ~c~n~ ~peno ~ <br />O~nge C~nc~'o ~r~a~on ~ are ~ ~ deve~d ~ pc~de re~e~ co <br /> <br /> ~in~ra~ areu. ~vel~nC ~ass ~eprasefl~ a ~cenCial suppleMn~al <br />~ing ~ar~ a~ as su~ ~ ~en ~e~ ~nsideca~i~ ~ ~e ~rd o~ <br />S~rvisocs loc ~ 2~. <br /> <br /> ~e dev,Jlopsen~ fee program prepared loc Bo·rd of Supervisors ~onsidera~lo~ is <br /> based upon ~ovsrmmenc Code SectionJ 50029, 66484.3 end Califormi& Constitution <br /> Article 11, Section 7. The concept As furcAe~uore based on CAe general <br /> p~£nciple ~hat ~uCure developlMnt within pre$cr£bed benefit areas will <br /> £rcn the construction of ~he ~raflll:Or~ltion f&cilities and should pay for them <br /> ia proporti~ ~ projected corridor traffic demand att~ib~cable ~o CAe <br /> development. ?UCGFe ~evelopmeflt wicAIA CAe bemefit areas is expec'.e~ to <br /> account fc~ 48~ of CAe cost Of ~he Su'KTC ·nd F/ETC. The re~aiAiAg cost of the <br /> corridors, repre·entiAg benefits derived bM existing development viCAin ~he <br /> benefit areas and corridor users outsi~e CAe bene£it areas, is proposed to ba <br /> fum~ed cArough trediCiomal tt·r,t!x)~CACiom .'un, sAg So, roes ·uch as exisciA~ <br /> federal end irate progr=~-. No sesesseemt o~ eal·tiAg ~evelope~ property <br /> propose~. <br /> <br /> Corridor usage 'p~oJec~loms ~or several hunted ~TaZfic a~ysis zones vi~.hia <br />· cae Co~n~ ~re developed as · tool Co assist ia defiaiag CAe p~oposed <br /> areas. ~Xaffic analysis zones wlCA 66 o~ Bore o~ CAeir CeCAl trap =.,king <br /> utAli=i~g ~ co~rido~ forme~ · fairly ,~enee ~atterrA. X~em~i~iaMle <br /> <br /> ea~lia~ ~se~ ~n ~i~ ~ o~ ~e ~za. ~a~l~ ~al~ zones <br /> vica 8~ or ~e o~ ~i~ ~i ~rip ~ki~ uC~l=l~ ~ ~d~ ~ de~ned <br /> ia ~e higher ~se m~ CA). ~e Fuia~e: of ~e ~s ~re de~in~ ~ ~e <br /> XM~ ~ z~e (B). <br /> <br />AJseasuent of ~se· on · ~.ca~ic related basis vas dete~mined co be equitable. <br />Tr~p ends were selected as the least co~uofl den~iaator and fees va~e <br />es~ablished bM dividing CAe p~opor~lon of corridor cost attribu~able to each <br />fee zone bM ~.~e to,al n~mber o~ p=o~C~ ~ Crip I~l vl~ each ~ee <br />z~e. MJusmnu ~e Male ~o ~ci9 e~s M~n ueigh~h~ m~cial and <br />Fasiden~ial la~ uses ~ ~e~l~ ~e ralaCi~ ~ne~i~ o~ neig~rh~ <br /> <br />general ~ ~ caC~oties 62 tesidea~ial a~ ~ ~casAdenciil) ~o~ ~e <br /> <br />-1- <br /> <br /> <br />