My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
86-024
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1986
>
86-024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2015 8:23:17 AM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
86-24
Date
3/17/1986
Document Relationships
86-014
(Amends)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 86-24 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF SANTA ANA VACATING A <br />PEDESTRIAN PASSAGEWAY BETWEEN ALTON <br />AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL- <br />ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council heretofore adopted on <br />February 18, 1986, Resolution No. 86-14 wherein it <br />declared its intention to vacate, pursuant to and in <br />accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3 of Part 3 of <br />Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State <br />of California, a pedestrian passageway between Alton <br />Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said Resolution gave notice that on <br />March 17, 1986, at 7:30 p.m., or as soon'thereafter as <br />the matter could be heard, in the City Council Chambers <br />of the City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa <br />Ana~ California, this Council would hear any and all <br />persons interested in or objecting to said proposed <br />vacation of said pedestrian passageway; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council, at the time and place <br />set for hearing, heard any and persons interested in or <br />objecting to said proposed vacation of said pedestrian <br />passageway, and received and considered all evidence <br />submitted; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council finds from all the evidence <br />submitted that the said pedestrian passageway described <br />hereinbelow, is unnecessary for present or prospective <br />public use, based on the following findings of fact: <br /> <br /> 1. Said pedestrian passageway is not necessary <br />to provide access to the abutting property owner; <br /> <br /> 2. Said pedestrian passageway is not necessary <br />or convenient for servicing the flow of traffic; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 2381 <br />of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, <br />the City Cuncil does hereby find and determine that said <br />paaageway is not useful as a nonmotorized transportation <br />facility, as defined in ~ 156 of said code; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 8340(c) <br />of said Streets and Highways Code, the City Council does <br />hereby find and determine that there are no in-place <br />utility facilities that are in use in said passagway; <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.