My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
89-100
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1989
>
89-100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2015 2:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
89-100
Date
10/16/1989
Document Relationships
89-101
(Amended By)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O75 <br /> <br /> (a) Mitigation measures incorporated into <br />the Project and adopted as Conditions of Approval have <br />substantially mitigated most of the environmental impacts of <br />the Project, excepting only cumulative impacts which cannot be <br />avoided by adoption of any Project alternative and visual <br />impacts relating to light, glare, and views, which impacts are <br />subjective and cannot be entirely avoided due to the existing <br />development on and around the Project Site. Accordingly, the <br />perceived mitigating benefits of approving the No Project <br />Alternative have been diminished or eliminated. <br /> <br /> (b) The No Project Alternative would not <br />provide capital improvements for adjacent roadways and would <br />not provide for construction of area-wide public transportation <br />improvements. In addition to mitigating Project impacts, these <br />aspects of the Project are environmental benefits which may <br />alleviate cumulative problems resulting from area-wide growth <br />in general. <br /> <br /> (c) Approval of the No Project Alternative <br />would result in the loss of developed office space and the <br />Jobs, economic benefits and public revenues that would be <br />generated by such development. <br /> <br /> (d) Approval of the No Project Alternative <br />would result in a loss of construction jobs that will be <br />provided through development of the Project. <br /> <br /> (e) The environmental, economic, social and <br />other benefits of the Project would not be obtained. <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.