Laserfiche WebLink
Roger M. Sullivan <br />October 30, 1989 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />To remove the A~r Partners' property from the project area would be <br />inappropriate since it would fragment the plaontng process, possibly <br />lessen the potential for correction of the blighting influences in <br />surrounding areas and reduce the possibility of achieving the policies of <br />the City's General Plan in an orderly manner. Therefore, this property <br />should remain in the project area. <br /> <br />In addition, we would like to direct your attention to several Sections <br />of the Redevelopment Plan which may also address your clients' concerns. <br />Sections 303 and 304 provlde opportunities for Owner Participation and <br />extend preferences for persons engaged in business in the project area, <br />and Section 406 contains provisions for Agency determination of <br />conforming properties. A property owner may apply for a Certificate of <br />Conformance which confirms that a particular parcel conforms to <br />applicable City codes and the Plan. Please feel free to call me at <br />714/647-5360 if you wish to discuss these issues in more detail. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Robert B, Hoffman t~ ~' <br />Redevelopment & Real Estate Manager <br /> <br />RBH/dt/9 <br /> <br /> <br />