|
237
<br />
<br />Ordinance NooNS-522
<br />Amendment to Admini-
<br />strative Electrical
<br />Code ~ ?~
<br />
<br />J. Ogden Markel
<br />Major Street Plan
<br />(Vacation portion
<br />St. Andrew Place)
<br />
<br />Petition
<br />protesting operation
<br />of laundry equipment
<br />620 E. Sixth St.
<br />
<br />Communications
<br />Boundary Commission,
<br />Board of Supervisors,
<br />et al
<br />
<br /> CounciLman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance entia
<br /> tled:
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance No. NS-522 enacting Section 830~ of Chapter B of
<br /> Article VIII of the Santa Ana Municipal Code to provide
<br /> amendment to the Administrative Electrical Code, known as
<br /> 'Orange County Administrative Electrical Code of 1959',
<br /> adopted by Ordinance No. NS-~93"
<br />
<br /> was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes, CounciLmen Royal E. Hubbard, Henry H. Schlueter,
<br /> Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br /> Noes, Councilmen None
<br /> Absent, Councilmen Dale H. Heinly
<br />
<br /> Mr. J. Ogden Markel, 181~ So. Parton Street, questioned the Resolution vacating a
<br />
<br /> portion of St. Andrew Place, between Standard Avenue and the Southern Pacific Rail.
<br />
<br /> for co~ls~der~$1on
<br /> road right-of-way, and presenmed/a Ma0or ~mreet Plan, dated September 20, 1955,
<br />
<br /> stating St. Andrew Place is indicated thereon as a potential artery to connect wit!
<br /> the South Main Street business area. On motion of Counci~m~u Hubbard, seconded b~
<br /> Schlueter and carried, the map of the Major Street Plan was received and filed.
<br />
<br /> A petition was presented signed by approximately 88 persons protesting the continue
<br /> use of certain newly installed equipment at the Arrow Laundry & Cleaners, 620 E.
<br /> Sixth Street, stating its operation shakes the ground, has broken windows and cause
<br /> other structural damage to buildings within a four-block area. Approximately 25
<br /> persons stood in protest of the operation. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, secon-
<br /> ded by Schlueter and carried, the petition was received and filed. The Attorney
<br /> stated that in response to calls the Police and Building Departments have investi-
<br /> gated the condition, and a report has been requested from the Building Department,
<br /> as well as the Police Department, relative to the nuisance of the vibration. The
<br /> Mayor asked the Attorney if the problem is a public or a private nuisance, and the
<br /> Attorney stated sufficient information is not available to determine the nuisance
<br /> definition. On motion of Counci~ Hubbard,. secc~ded by B~ewer and carried, the
<br /> Manager and Attorney were instructed to make the necessary determination, before
<br /> the next meeting, as to whether or not the operatian of the laundry is a public or
<br /> a private nuisance, and to proceed with the necessary action, and the spokesman be
<br /> advised as to what avenues are open to them. Mr. C. V. Robinson, 603 E. Sixth
<br /> Street, stated when the Variance was approved by the City Council in 19B7, the
<br /> Variance was protested as it is a residential area, and we were assured there woul~
<br /> be no disturbance from the laundry and no heavy machinery would be installed.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Councilm-n Hubbard, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the following
<br /> co~mmmicatiens were received and filed:
<br />
<br /> Fro~ the Boundary C.~-~tssion regarding proposed annexation of territory to
<br /> the City of Orange "Annexation No. 168," advising the boundaries of the proposed
<br /> annexation meet the approval of the County Surveyor's office in respect to Section
<br /> ~5002 of the Government Code,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary C~,.,ission regarding proposed annexation of territory to th~
<br /> City of Tustin "Vanderlip and Rowan Annexation - Revised," advising the boundaries
<br /> ~of the proposed annexation meet the approval of the County Surveyor's office in
<br /> respect to Section 35002 of the Government Code, although it cuts property logicall
<br />
<br /> Frc~ the Board of Supervisors advising the petition of City's Resolution No.
<br /> 61-1~0, requesting the exemption of property within the City from.t~ of anM
<br />County tax to provide structural fire protection was received, ~orde~ed filed,~ and
<br />g~Y~Athe Clerk instructed to certify the receipt of said request ~o the County Audi$~
<br /> Controller,
<br />
<br /> From the Board of Supervisors advising the copy of Ordinance No. NS-S19, adop.
<br /> g#J~ted June 5, 1961, ~mending code provisions dealing with fly control, was received
<br /> and ordered filed,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|