My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
92-022
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1992
>
92-022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2015 4:25:33 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
92-22
Date
3/2/1992
Document Relationships
92-009
(Amends)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\1952 - 1999\1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,' 171 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 92-022 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF SANTA ANA VACATING A PORTION OF RICHLAND <br />STREET WEST OF FLOWER STREET <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council heretofore adopted on February 3, <br />1992, Resolution No. 92-009, wherein it declared its intention to <br />vacate, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of <br />Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code <br />of the State of California, a portion of Richland Street west of <br />Flower Street. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said Resolution gave notice that on March 2, <br />1992, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter could be <br />heard, in the Council Chambers of the city of Santa Ana, 20 civic <br />Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California, this Council would hear any <br />and all persons interested in or objecting to said proposed <br />vacation of the said street; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council finds that said Resolution has been <br />published in the manner prescribed by law for the publishing of <br />ordinances of the City; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council further finds that notices of said <br />proposed street vacation stating the purposes of said Resolution <br />and the time and place set for hearing were posted as directed by <br />the Council and required by law; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council at the time and place set for <br />hearing heard any and all persons interested in or objecting to <br />said proposed vacation of said street and received and considered <br />all evidence submitted; <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council finds from all the evidence <br />submitted that the said street is unnecessary for present or <br />prospective public use, based upon the following findings of fact: <br /> <br /> 1. Said street is not necessary to provide access to <br />abutting property owners. <br /> <br /> 2. Said street is not necessary or convenient for servicing <br />the flow of traffic. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of S 2381 of the <br />Streets and Highway Code of the State of California, the City <br />Council does hereby find and determine that neither said street nor <br />any part thereof is useful as nonmotorized transportation <br />facilities, as defined in § 156 of said Code; <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.