|
405
<br />
<br />iReso. No. 62-45 The Council having unanimously waived the reading of the Resolution, on motion of
<br />iAdopt Budget for
<br />expenditure of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Resolution en-
<br />
<br />iGas Tax Funds from
<br />~iState Highway (fis-
<br />cal year 1961-62)
<br />
<br />titled:
<br />
<br />"Resolution No. 62-45 of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana
<br />adopting and submitting a budget for expenditure of funds allocated
<br />from the State Highway Fund to Cities"
<br />
<br />being the gas tax allocation for the fiscal year 1962-63, was considered and passed
<br />
<br />by the following vote:
<br />
<br />!i0rdinance No. NS-566
<br />i~Establish future R/W
<br />~lines portions 17th
<br />list, Sugar Ave, et al
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen Royal E. Hubbard, Henry H. Schlueter,
<br /> Dale H. Heinly, Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />Noes, Councilmen None
<br />Absent, Councilmen None
<br />
<br />Councilman Heinly disqualified himself on the following Ordinance.
<br />
<br />The Council
<br />
<br />having unanimously waived the reading of the Ordinance, on motion of Councilman
<br />
<br />Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance entitled:
<br />
<br />"Ordinance No. NS-566 establishing future right-of-way lines along
<br /> portions of Seventeenth Street, Sugar Avenue, Warner Avenue, Santa
<br /> Clara Avenue, Memory Lane, Edinger Avenue and Dyer Road-Talbert
<br />
<br />:Ordinance No. NS-567
<br />Amend. Appl. No. 376
<br /> ~ Commission
<br />
<br />was considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />Not Voting, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Henry H. Schlueter,
<br />Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />None
<br />None
<br />Dale H. Heinly
<br />
<br />Councilman Heimly disqualified himself on the following Ordinance.
<br />
<br />The Council
<br />
<br />having unanimously waived the reading of the Ordinance, on motion of Councilman
<br />
<br />Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, the following Ordinance entitled:
<br />
<br />"Ordinance No. NS-567 amending Article IX of the Santa Ana Municipal
<br />Code to change district classification on Amendment Application No.
<br />376 and emending Sectional District Map 12-5-10 (Exhibit AA 376A)"
<br />
<br />initiated by the Planning Co~ission, to reclassify from the R2, R3, P, Cl, and C2
<br />
<br />Districts to the P and CD District, property on both sides of Birch Street between
<br />
<br />Eighth and Tenth Streets and properties on the north side of Eighth Street and on
<br />
<br />the south side of Sixth Street between Broadway and Flower Street, including the
<br />
<br />'Communications
<br />i;Boundary Commission,
<br />City of Orange,
<br />et al
<br />
<br />Civic Center area bounded by Eighth Street, Broadway, Sixth and Flower Streets~ was
<br />considered and passed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Noes, Councilmen
<br />Absent, Councilmen
<br />Not Voting, Councilmen
<br />
<br />Royal E. Hubbard, Henry H. Schlueter,
<br />Bob Brewer, A. A. Hall
<br />None
<br />None
<br />Dale H. Heinly
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Schlueter and carried, the following
<br />
<br />communications were received, filed and where applicable referred to the proper
<br />Departments for processing:
<br />
<br /> Frc~ the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to the!
<br />City of Orange designated "Annexation No. 184," located 660 feet east of Prospect
<br />Avenue between LaVeta Street and the S.P.R.R., advising the boundaries of the pro-
<br />posed annexation are not definite and certain and all documents were referred back
<br />to the City for correction and resubmission,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to thel
<br />City of Costa Mesa designated "Adams No. 4 Annexation," advising the boundaries of
<br />the proposed annexation are not definite and certain, and all documents were refer-i
<br />red back to the City for correction and resubmission,
<br />
<br /> From the Boundary Commission regarding proposed annexation of territory to theil
<br />City of Costa Mesa designated "Paularino No. 5 Annexation, "advising the boundarie~
<br />of the proposed annexation are reasonably definite and certain, ~
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1842, proposing to
<br />annex certain real property east of Prospect Avenue between Walnut and Chapman
<br />Avenues, designated "Annexation No. 181,"
<br />
<br /> From the City of Orange submitting copy of Resolution No. 1843, proposing to
<br />annex certain real property west of Alameda Street between Walnut and Chapman Ave-
<br />nues, designated "Annexation No. 182,"
<br />
<br />
<br />
|