92-070 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

redevelopment plan amendments. Therefore, the Agency properly followed the Section 33452 noticing requirements by publishing the notice in accordance with Section 6063 of the Government Code. Section 33452 specifically states "the notice of hearing shall include a legal description of the boundaries of the project area by reference to the description recorded with the county recorder pursuant to Section 33373 and of the boundaries of the land proposed to be added to the project area, if any, and a general statement of the purpose of the amendment." The Agency's notice of hearing referred to the legal description recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder as Document Number 82-235809 and additionally, the Agency did publish !n the newspaper the legal metes and bounds descriptton of the project area. Furthermore, the District should not complain of defective notice if they actually received notice of the joint hearing and indeed attended the hearing and presented both oral and wr. itten testimony. The Agency cannot conclude that the District has demonstrated any harm as a result of the methodology used by the Agency in publishing the notices. "Failure of the Aeencv to Prepare a Report Pursuant to Section 33353.7"- - Objection: The District states that although they received responses to the FRC Report, "the responses were not prepar.ed and submitt?d (revie .w. ed andauthorized to be transmitted) by the City Council, but r.ather was (sic) prepared by. the Agency's consul.rant and transrmtted by the Agency staff w~thout any consideratton of the responses by the City Council acting as the Agency" (page Process-27). ~h: It is acknowledged by the District on page Process- 24 that the Commumty Redevelopment Commission, by resolution, approved the Report to the Santa Ama City Council for the Amendment to the South Harbor Boulevard/Fai~view Street Redevelopment Project Ar.e.a and authorizedtransmittal of the Rep. oft to the. City Councd. Reference is made to City Councd Resolution No. 91-102 wherein the City Council resolved that the Redevelopment Commission of the City of Santa Ama was authorized and directed to carry out those functi.ons of the Commu~ty Redevelopment Agency of the C~ty of Santa Ann whmh pertained to the A~nendment of Redevelopment Plans including but not limited to those functions of the Community Redevelopment Agency's which are specified in Article 12 commencing with Section 33450 of Chapter 4. of the Community Redevelopment Law. Included in Article 12 is Section 33457.1 which states that "to the extent warranted by a proposed amendment...the reports and information required by 445 15