92-070 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

454 The Agency, by the preparation and acceptance of the proposed Negative Declaration on the Plan Amendment, has suggested that there will be no significant environmental impact on the District. In contra.st, although the Agency has not agreed with the magnitude o.f financml detriment ca.used to,the District, they have at least by their recent offer of mitigauon, acknowledged that there will be some level of financial i. mp.a. ct on the D. is.trict. It ~s co ~nf?ing as t.o how the Agency can justify even a mammum level of financial unpact and not justify some level of environmental impact. Response: The Agency has stated from the beginning of the environmental review process to date that the project would not significantly impact .the District. Th.e District has Indicated the Plan Amendment would ~mpact the District, and presented its calculations and report on impact as part of the fiscal review process in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33353.5. The Agency has acknowledged that there may be some generation of new students to the District. However, any new students that may be generated do not meet the definition of significant as identified in Section 15382 and Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The Agency has consistently indicated that .fiscal impact and fiscal participa. Uon between the Agency and the .D~strict .should approprmtely be addressed as part of the fiscal rewew process pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 33353 through 33353.7. Addressing th.ese fiscal issues as part of the environmentalreview process is duphcative and unnecessary. The Agency has, in fact; offered to provide revenues to assist the District in providing facilities for approximately 500 new students that may be generated by development in the Project Area over the next 40,~ears (an average of 10 stuoents per year). The potential generation ot these students over .the next 40 years does not equate into a significant environmental ~mpact. Therefore, the Agency does not consider that the Plan Amendment would have a significant environmental impact on the District. Comment: The basic variable to the District's responsibilities is the number of students it must offer education services and facilities to. As the student enrollment of the District increases, the cost to provide instruction increases. Similarly, as the enrollment increased, the District's facilities become overcrowded requiring expansion, new facilities and new campuses. Also, as student enrollment increases, the general environment around the District's campuses deteriorate as a result of increased traffic, noise and activities related to the use of their facilities. Finally, as enrollment increases, it necessitates the District to initiate and pursue capital improvements to expand our facilities, which cert.ainly have an effect on the physical environment within the surrounding campuses. All of these effects are impacts as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and as such require some form of mitigation. The Agency cannot reasonably suggest that there will notbe an environmental impact on the District, based upon the documentation which has been presented to the