92-070 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

458 "District Capital Facility Cost Estimates" This section provid.es bac.kgroun.d.i.nformation on how the District calculated ~ts capital facilities costs in terms of a cost- per-student dollar amount. Because this section presents no .objection, the Age~cy'.s response is limited to the following. It ~s noted that the D~smct has assumed the need for 500 square feet per parking space. It is the Agency's opinion, based upon experience with commercial development of varying sizes, that the allocation of 350 s.quare feet per parking space is more than adequate to provide both the space for the. parking stall and the accessways through the parking lot. It ~s the Agency's opinion that this correction alone would lower the cost-per- student dollar amount from $22,400 to $19,400 or a 13% decrease in cost. Because the Agency is not in a position to comment on the other standards used (i.e., square foot per student (22.5), the numb.er of parking spaces needed for classrooms, nor the reqmred square feet per classroom) the Agency will at th!s time accept that the District has not overstated these ~tems in their calculation. "Stadents Per Square Foot of Nonresidential Building" In this section, the District presents its methodology used to determine the cost per Sqluare fo.ot of nonresidential development. No objecUon is raised in this section; therefore, the Agency will limit its response to noting that the cost per square foot is based upon a 1992 dollar cost per student of $22,400 which presumes, in the Agency's opinion, excessive cost for parking based upon the Agency's experience in the construction of parking lots. "Housing Set-Aside Requirements" Although this section does not contain any direct "objections" to the adoption of the am.endment, the District does again state its opinion that the provisions of Resolution No. 84-3 and Stipulated Judgment No. 3858-61 do not apply to the proposed ..Amendment. The A..gency and the District continue to d~sagree on the apphcation of these requirements to the proposed Amendment. "Subsidy for Low and Moderate Income Housing" Although this sect!on does not. raise any direct objections to the plan, the Dist.nct has now ~.ndicatedthat the $25,000 per housing unit subsidy assumed ~n their calculation of impact caused by the hons~ng set-aside funds can be substantiated based upon a new analysis by the District. The report states "CSA contacted the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as the State of California Housin$ and Community Development Department to obtain statistical information and assistance in developing a projection scenario which represents a reasonable scenario for defining projected