My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
92-070
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1992
>
92-070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:31:32 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
92-70
Date
7/21/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
431 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> WRITTEN RESPONSES TO WRITI~EN OBJECTIONS <br /> SUBMITTED AT THE <br /> JUNE 16, 1992 JOINT PUBLIC HEARING <br /> ON THE <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />FOR THE SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD/FAIRVIEW STREET <br />REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA <br /> <br />July 16, 1992 <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />On June 16, 1992, the City Council and the Santa Aha Redevelopment Commission <br />held a joint public hearing on theproposed Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan <br />for the South Harbor Boulevard/Fairview Street Redevelopment Project Area and <br />the environmental documentation ("Negative Declaration") related thereto. Section <br />33363 of the California Redevelopment Law requires the City Council/Agency to <br />respo, nd in writing to all written objections submitted prior to and at the public <br />hearing. The written responses must describe the disposition of the issues raised <br />and all written objections shall be addressed in detail giving reasons for not <br />accepting specified objections and su. ggestions. The response shall include a good <br />faith, reasoned analysis, and conclustonary statements unsupported by factual <br />information are not considered sufficient. <br /> <br />Prior to the June 16th public hearing, there were no written objections from <br />property owners or tenants from within the Project Area regarding the proposed <br />Amendment. At the public hearing there were four letters re.ceived fi.om property <br />owners which supported the proposed Amendment and additmnally, written <br />objections were received from the following: <br /> <br />1. Nancy Liao, County of Orange - a letter and copy of fiscal impact report <br /> <br />2. Rancho Santiago Community College presented the following: <br /> <br />a. Vivian Blevins, Chancellor, RSCC - script entitled, "Financial <br /> Detriment" and RSCC Resolution No. 656 <br /> <br />Bryan Conley, President, RSCC Board - script entitled, "Education <br />First" <br /> <br />Carol Enos, Trustee, RSCC Board - script entitled, "Existence of <br />Blight" <br /> <br />d. Bob Partridge, Administrative Dean, RSCC - script entitled, <br /> "Condition of District" <br /> <br />eo <br /> <br />John Raya, Trustee, RSCC Board - script entitled, "General Plan <br />Conformity" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.