92-070 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~: Santa Ama Unified requests that the City Coun.cil and Redevelopment Commission postpone adoption of the ordinance which implements the amendment as well as filing of the Notice of Determination until such an agreement has been executed. We know of no legal constraints which require you to act at this time. implementation of the South Harbor Boulevard Redevelopment Project Area amendment without mitigation o.f the impacts upon Santa Ana U.n. ified would greatly harm the District's ability to provide adequate school facilities and a sound educational experience. ~: Agency st.a. ff has subsequently met with SAUSD represent.a, tives but no resolution of differences has yet occurred. Adoption of the ordinance approving the Amendment does not preclude the District and Agency from further negotiations. ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION In a letter from Leonard D. Brinley dated June 16, 1992, Mr. Brinley's objections are contained in 28 numbered comments. Because many of the comments relate to the same topic, the following summarizes the objections by topic. 1. lnadeo_uate Environmental Documentation (Comments 2,3,5,6,7,10,12,21,22,24,25 and 27) Objection: The Superintendent states that the environmental doc. umentation should have been an environmental impact report which should have documented the level of impacts on the school, cumulative impacts, and mitigation measures. ~: These objections and other related objections are addressed in the response to the Rancho Santiago Community College objections, m particular Section 11(5). Fi~¢ol Detriment (Comments 3,4,5,6,7,15,16,17,19 and 20) O~ection: The Superintendent objects to the Amendment because the A. gency has not documented the Superintendent's impact, nor allewated the impact. Response: The Superintendent, as required under the fiscal review process, prepared a fiscal impact report which was incorporated into the FRC Report. The Agency.previously responded to that report and the response is contamedan Sect~o.n. M of the Report to Council. The Agency has made a.n offer to the D~strict to pass-through a portion of the revenue, m the future (.155%) or 7.2% of the Superintendent's portion, but that offer has been rejected. The. Superintendent and Agency continue to disagree on the calculatton of impact and corresponding level of pass-through.