Laserfiche WebLink
145 <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />The No Project Alternative Would allow the area located <br />within the proposed Enterprise Zone to continue to develop <br />without any assista ,n~e from the California Department of <br />Commerce Enterprise Zone Program. Business development and <br />growth would continue into the future determined mostly by <br />the private sector and the City. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE FINANCING <br /> <br />This alternative would require the City of Santa Aha to seek <br />alternative sources of revenue to fund needed building <br />improvements, business relocations and expansions and other <br />projects. Other sources of revenue the City could consider <br />include infrastructure finance districts, Redevelopment <br />Agency industrial development bonds, community development <br />block grant (CDBG) funds, economic development administration <br />(EDA) funds, assessment districts and county, state and <br />federal assistance and funding programs. <br /> <br />REDUCED PROJECT AREA <br /> <br />This project alternative would reduce the proposed Enterprise <br />Zone area to a smaller geographical area. In order to reduce <br />the area, commercial and industrial uss would be removed from <br />the Zone. The areas deleted from the proposed zone would <br />have to be those areas that would result in fewer <br />environmental impacts and still meet the objective of the <br />Enterprise Zone program. <br /> <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> <br />There are three possible findings under CEQA with respect to <br />the significant effects of a project: <br /> <br />Finding 1: <br /> <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, <br />or incorporated into, the project which avoid <br />or substantially lessen the significant envir- <br />onmental effect identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br />Findinq 2: <br /> <br />Such changes or alterations are within the <br />responsibility or jurisdiction of another <br />public agency and not the agency making the <br />finding, such changes have been adopted by <br />such other agency or can and should be adopted <br />by such other agency. <br /> <br />Finding 3: <br /> <br />Specific economic, social or other <br />considerations make infeasible the mitigation <br />measures or project alternatives identified in <br />the EIR. <br /> <br /> <br />