|
and several Elementary Districts. Inasmuch as the area in question will not be-
<br />
<br />come a part of the Santa Ana School Districts, there would be no legal implications
<br />
<br />involved; and read a report of the Annexation Ce--.~.fttee dated Jul~ 16, 1962, favor-
<br />
<br />lng the proposed ann~ation. On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Brewer
<br />
<br />Joe O'Campo
<br />Favoring the
<br />Annexation
<br />
<br />and carried, the documents were received end filed.
<br />
<br />Joe O'Campo, 1237 West Pine, Orange County Educational Committee, representing the
<br />
<br />Trade Unions, stated the c.~'-,.-ittee adopted a Resolution favorim~ this annexation.
<br />
<br />If this a~exation is approved it will afford other areas the opportunity to be
<br />
<br />annexed to the City, increasing construction activity and creating more ~obs in
<br />
<br />Douglas Clark,
<br />William B. Moore,
<br />Charles G. Schlegeland
<br />Ralph Vernon
<br />Favoring
<br /> ~ q~e ~n~exation
<br /> Letters approving
<br /> annexat ion:
<br /> Ross Cortese
<br /> Frank J. Gelinas
<br /> John G. Lozano
<br /> R. L Crutcher
<br />
<br />Orange County.
<br />
<br />Dc~s Clark, 1510 North Mar-Less Drive, Santa Aha; William B. Moore, Chairma~ of
<br />
<br />Planning C~m,,tssion; Attorney Charles G. Schlegel, ~33 West 8th Street; and Ralph
<br /> A~ nue,
<br />Vernon, 14~0 Cypress~ gave their reasons for approving the annexation.
<br />
<br />Letters approving the an-exation were presented from Ross W. Cortese, President of
<br />
<br />Rosamoor Leisure World, a corporation; Frank J. Gelinas, Secretary'Manager, Santa
<br />
<br />Aha Chamber of C.~,~erce, 802 W. 8th Street; John G. Lozano, Business Representatiw
<br />
<br />Cement Masons Local No. 52, 1605 N. Harper Street; and R. L. Crutcher, President,
<br />
<br />Jennie S. Crutcher Foundaticu, Inc., ~29 E. Coast Highway, Coroua del Mar.
<br />
<br />motion of Counci!~-n Hubbard, seconded by Brewer and carried, c.=.-.~uications were
<br />
<br />Jack Rimel
<br />Favoring the
<br />~unexation
<br />
<br />received end filed.
<br />
<br />Attorney Jack Rimel, representing Ross Cortese, stated this is a matter which the
<br />City Council initiated on its own Resolution and they are well informed and know
<br />the facts. Mr. Rimel introduced Mr. Lettson, who is entirely familiar with the
<br />
<br />operation of the Leisure World program and the developers are not inexperienced in
<br />
<br />this type of development and have a substential development in the western part of
<br />
<br />the county at Seal Beach, one that has been extremely successful; Attorney Fra~W
<br />
<br />Hamilton, Los Angeles, who will be helpful to the Council if any questions along
<br />
<br />the line of status of proceedings are required; Jack Fowler, who is familiar with
<br />
<br />this Project, end Bob Galeno and John Tupps, Engineers, who have worked on the
<br />
<br />plans and engineering on this project were also introduced to the Council. The
<br />
<br />developer is desirous and hopeful that the property will be annexed to the City of
<br />
<br />Report
<br />Director of
<br />Public Works
<br />
<br />Hearing Closed.
<br />
<br />The Manager stated this is the report as submitted by the Director of Public Works:
<br />
<br />Walter J. Pollard
<br />
<br />Land end Improv~uts
<br />Owner
<br />
<br />City
<br />
<br />Irvine Cca~pany
<br />
<br />$398,690.00
<br />
<br />$37,690. O0
<br />
<br />Irvine Ranch Water District. No knowledge of date of acquisition; probably
<br />after date of c~cing annexation, as it is exactly 300 feet wide and over-
<br />lying our an~axation of 300 feet.
<br />
<br />State Department of Public Works is the San Diego Freeway and is now being
<br />used by the Public as a FreeWaY. It should be noted that the County Assessor
<br />has assigned a value to the land, concrete pavt~E and structures for protest
<br />purposes only, of $289,800.00.
<br />
<br /> Total assessed vaZuation of privately owned property $194,260.00 -_ 100~.
<br />
<br /> Tota% assessed valuation of privately owned property protesting $61,180.00 _-
<br /> 31.55 of total
<br /> Therefore, less than 50~ ~f the %o~al privately owned property pretested.
<br />
<br />It was moved by Councllm-- Hubbard, secc~ded by Heiuly and carried, tha~c the City
<br />
<br />
<br />
|