Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION 94-020 <br /> <br />333 <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Implementation of mitigation measure for the South Main Redevelop- <br />merit Plan ': <br /> <br />Improve traffic flow on Main Street <br /> <br />Improve traffic flow on McFadden Avenue <br /> <br />Improve bicycle and pedestrian safety at schools in the vicinity <br /> <br />Reduce through traffic on Cypress Avenue. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> <br />Chapter 6.0 in the Final EIR compare~ the environmental effects of the No <br />Project Alternative to the propoc~"d project and the reasons for rejection of <br />the alternatives considered and rejected. <br /> <br />No Proje~ <br /> <br />Under the No Project Alternative, the existing alignment and width of <br />McFadden Avenue would remain the same and the offset intersection along <br />Main Street will remain the same. <br /> <br />Alternatioes Considered and Rejected <br /> <br />Alternatives that were considered and rejected include: <br /> <br />Realign McFadden Avenue without widening; <br />Realign and widen McFadden bisecting Lathrop Intermediate High <br />School; <br />Widen McFadden Avenue without realignment; and <br />Widen Main Street at McFadden. <br /> <br />IV. HNDINGS OF FACT <br /> <br />As stated previously, there are three possible findings under CEQA with <br />r~pect to the significant effects of a project: <br /> <br />Finding <br /> <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, or in- <br />cz)ri;orated into, the project which avoid or substan- <br />tially lessen the significant environmental effect as <br />identified in the final EL~ <br /> <br />04/t t/940: ~SNA402,,FINDINGS.IL'T) <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />